Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br /> <br />Approach 2 / Scenario 3 <br />Includes operation of Blue Mesa Reservoir to satisfy the demands of <br />existing downstream water requirements, including the Gunnison <br />Tunnel, similar to what has historically occurred. <br />Assumptions: <br /> <br />1) Inflow to Blue Mesa was estimated using the historic diversions <br />to the Gunnison Tunnel, recorded streamflows downstream to the <br />tunnel, the hi stori c monthly changes in 81 ue Mesa storage <br />(1965-1986) and an estimate of the evaporation losses. <br /> <br />2) Includes all of the assumptions of Scenario 2, i.e., the minimum <br />streamflow requirements decreed in 82CW340. <br /> <br />3) Pumping from Taylor Park Reservoir to Union Park Reservoir was <br />assumed to be a maximum of 12 hours per day, when water is available. <br /> <br />4) ~inimum streamflow requirement downstream of the Gunnison Tunnel <br />equal to 300 cfs. <br /> <br />5) Releases from Blue Mesa Reservoir were made to meet minimum flow <br />(300 cfs), historic Gunnison Tunnel diversion and any shortages <br />wh i ch may occur at the headgate of the Redl ands Power Canal near <br />Grand Junction (670 cfs). <br /> <br />6) No requirement for hydroelectric diversions at Blue Mesa. <br /> <br />-36- <br />