My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11573
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11573
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:18:04 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:03:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.766
Description
Gunnison River General Publications - Correspondence - Reports - Etc
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
3/1/1993
Author
Unknown
Title
Scoping Report for the Gunnison River Contract - Analysis Notebook - Section I - Comments by Source
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />, , · 5 () ') <br />M.:. OJ.. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />Public Scoping Comments, Gunnison River Contract, cont. <br /> <br />.... ~... <br />..<}~;:.::::.: <br /> <br />".-:..... <br /> <br />13b. ARAPAHOE; pI, '2. As the Bureau of Reclamation ("BUREC") is well aware, Arapahoe has been <br />involved in substantial litigation with numerous entities concerning water availability in the Gunnison <br />River. However, Arapahoe still firmly believes that there is ample water available for Arapahoe's <br />proposed Union Park Reservoir Project, the Aspinall Unit, and the Monumenl. That case is currently <br />on appeal to the Colorado Supreme Court but the issues surrounding the operation of the Aspinall Unit <br />for purposes of the subject Contract will directly affect Colorado's ability to utilize its Colorado River <br />Compact entitlements. <br /> <br />22. ARAPAHOE; p2,'1. I. NEPA Process - The range of proposed guaranteed flows in both the <br />puhlic information packet and the proposed Contract are so broad as to make any detailed public <br />comments impossible. The BUREC should comply with all NEPA substantive and procedural <br />requirements by conducting the necessary studies and preparing an EIS before it enters into 'any <br />contract for flows in the Black Canyon. The proposed Contract is a major Federal action significantly <br />affecting the quality of the human environment. The needs for and effects from flow regimes in the <br />Monument must be studied and defined for meaningful public and agency inpUI. Without those studies <br />it cannot be determined what fluctuations and flushing flows would actually damage the Monument and <br />river environment. <br /> <br />13a. <br /> <br />ARAPAHOE; p2, '2. 2. Constraints Under the Colorado River Storaee Proiect Act - There is <br />ample water in the Gunnison River to maintain stream flows in the Monument. However, those flows <br />can be maintained witbout suhstantially interfering with Colorado's right to develop its Compact <br />entitlement and within the legal framework of the Colorado River Storage Project Acl. <br /> <br />~v.. <br />':;.:':;:", ... <br />'..,....,::,;,' <br />....~::': ,. <br /> <br />02. ARAPAHOE; p2,'3. The Aspinall Unit was constructed as part of the Colorado River Storage <br />Project lIin order to initiate the comprehensive development of the water resources of the Upper <br />Colorado River Basin for the purposes of regulating the flow of the Colorado River, storing water for <br />beneficial consumptive use, making it possible for the states of the Upper Basin to use consistently <br />within the provisions of the Colorado River Compact, the apportionments to and among tbem in the <br />Colorado River Compact and the Upper Colorado River Basin Compact, respectively, providing for the <br />reclamation of arid and semi-arid land, for the control of floods, and for the generating of hydroelectric <br />power, as an incident to the foregoing. . . . " In connection with the Colorado River Storage Project, <br />the Secretary is also authorized to construct public recreational facilities and facilities to mitigate losses <br />and improve conditions for the propagation of fish and wildlife. <br />ARAPAHOE;,p2,'4. From the text of the Colorado River Storage Project referenced above, it is <br />clear that the Aspinall Unit does not have dec~eed water rights for the purposes contemplated in the <br />proposed Contract. Constructing facilities for the propagation of fish and wildlife and mitigation of <br />losses at the Aspinall Unit is not the same as making substantial releases for instream uses for miles <br />downstream. Even if BUREC believes that the authority exists within CRSPA to make releases solely <br />for those purposes. the Contract should make it clear that those uses are incidental uses to the primary <br />purposes of the Aspinall Unit, and cannot interfere with either the primary purposes of the Aspinall <br />Unit or the right of Colorado to use its Compact apportionments. <br /> <br />7a. ARAPAHOE; p2, '3. The Aspinall Unit was constructed as part of the Colorado River Storage <br />Project "in order to initiate the comprehensive development of the water resources of the Upper <br />Colorado River Basin for the purposes of regulating the flow of the Colorado River, storing water for <br />beneficial consumptive use, making it possible for the states of the Upper Basin to use consistently <br />within the provisions of the Colorado River Compact, the apportionments to and among them in tbe <br /> <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.