My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11573
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11573
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:18:04 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:03:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.766
Description
Gunnison River General Publications - Correspondence - Reports - Etc
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
3/1/1993
Author
Unknown
Title
Scoping Report for the Gunnison River Contract - Analysis Notebook - Section I - Comments by Source
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />001530 <br /> <br />Public Scoping Comments, Gunnison River Contract, conI. <br /> <br /><!t:~i?) <br /> <br />8. <br /> <br />2.3. <br /> <br />12. <br /> <br />Seek viable balance between gains, benefits, and losses. <br /> <br />8. 2.3. 13. Determine, define, explain, and address agencies and individual water needs. . Find <br />balance. (USF&WS, Curecanti NRA, Black Canyon Monument, Gunnison Gorge, etc. and CDOW, <br />WAPA and BOR) <br /> <br />1681. 2.3. 14. Determine upstream impacts from Blue Mesa or on Blue Mesa from potential icing <br />because of highwater levels at Blue Mesa in winter~-i.e., new river channels (separate or distant from <br />eXisting recreation facilities, resources) and flooding. Sev:eral studies exist. Storing water in winter for <br />high spring releases could cause these high water level impacts shown above. <br /> <br />3h. 2.3. 15. How does this contract negotiation relate to Federal reserved water right in Black <br />Canyon National Monument and to the quantification of the righl. What is cost to values (Le., <br />, recreation, trout, endangered fish) from this experiment? <br /> <br />12. 2.3. 15. How does this contract negotiation relate to Federal reserved water right in Black <br />Canyon National Monument and to the quantification of the right. What is cost to values (Le., <br />recreation, trout, endangered fish) from this experiment? <br /> <br />12. <br /> <br />2.3. <br /> <br />16. <br /> <br />Test alternatives via models before implementation.. <br /> <br />14a. <br /> <br />2.3. 17. Low water levels in rafting season can impact economics of industry. High water <br />levels benefit industry economically; provide prolonged flows to support rafting longer than "spring <br />flushes." . <br /> <br />. ~.."/...,:. <br /> <br />.... - .:.,'. .<.. ~ <br />:~J::>~:..>' <br /> <br />18. 2.3. 17. 'Low ';"ater levels in rafting season can impact economics of industry. High water <br />levels benefit industry economically; provide prolonged flows to support rafting longer than "spring <br />flushes. " <br /> <br />13b. <br /> <br />2.3. <br /> <br />18. <br /> <br />How will contract affect Nature Conservancy water right in canyon? <br /> <br />14a. <br /> <br />2.3. <br /> <br />24. <br /> <br />Study needed: loss of flatwater recreation losses vs. downstream (recreation). <br /> <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.