Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,. <br /> <br />;~l~:Q~ <br /> <br />, ":.~.:.'.} <br />~. ..,:.' . <br />\Y:~~~?~J <br /> <br />...-.,' <br /> <br />OD1539 <br /> <br />Public Scoping Comments, Gunnison River Contract, conI. <br /> <br />15d. 2.2. 29. Effect of contract on wildlife hahitatlwetlands; for example, is river crossing (by <br />wildlife) affected downstream? <br /> <br />18d. 2.3. 01. Be comprehensive: address issues that could impact any values in Upper and Lower <br />(Gunnison) Basins. Look at all interrelationships. <br /> <br />8. <br /> <br />02. <br /> <br />Address interrelationships of releases. <br /> <br />2.3. <br /> <br />14a. <br /> <br />03. <br /> <br />Address recreation at all reservoirs in Aspinall Unit, particularly Blue Mesa. <br /> <br />2.3. <br /> <br />18. <br /> <br />Consider impacts to visual, agricultural and recreational values when water shipped <br />Also passive recreation values (sight-seeing, etc.) <br /> <br />2.3. 04. <br />out of Basin. <br /> <br />18e. <br /> <br />Consider economic impact of alternatives on recreation resources and communities. <br /> <br />2.3. <br /> <br />05. <br /> <br />12. <br /> <br />Economic impacts should not be sole criteria. <br /> <br />2.3. <br /> <br />06. <br /> <br />lb. 2.3. 07. Agreements: Contract should not affect existing agreements (i.e., 1975 Taylor <br />Park/Blue Mesa Reservoirs Exchange Agreement). <br /> <br />12. <br /> <br />Need equitable unit of measure for various recreational uses. <br /> <br />2.3. <br /> <br />08. <br /> <br />10. <br /> <br />2.3. 09. Ensure that contract does not give legal benefit to Lower Colorado River Basin States <br />over Upper Basin States. <br /> <br />1ge. 2.3. 09. Ensure that contract does not give legal benefit to Lower Colorado River Basin Slates <br />over Upper Basin States. <br /> <br />1ge. 3. 26. Is there excess water in drainage -- for projects such as Rocky Point, Arapahoe. <br />County, City of Aurora? Where do they stand in water rights priority? <br /> <br />3. 2.3. 10. Clarify (National Park Service position of) why it's important to reestablish historic <br />flows, and define what that is (historic flow). <br /> <br />14c. 2.3. II. What benefits will there be for recreation under proposed alternatives vs. existing <br />situation (i. e. trout fishing)? What will be lost, destroyed throughout Basin? <br /> <br />14a. <br /> <br />2.3. <br /> <br />How will historic flows benefit recreation in canyon? <br /> <br />11. <br /> <br />14a. 2.3. 11. What benefits will there be for recreation under proposed alternatives vs. existing <br />situation (i.e. trout fishing)? What will be lost, destroyed throughout Basin? <br /> <br />14a. 2.3. n. What benefits will there be for recreation under proposed alternatives vs. existing <br />situation (i.e. trout fishing)? What will be lost, destroyed throughout Basin? <br /> <br />18e. 2.3. 11. What benefits will there be for recreation under proposed alternatives vs. existing <br />situation (i.e. trout fishing)? What will be lost, destroyed throughout Basin? <br /> <br />II <br />