My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11571
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11571
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:18:03 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:03:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.106
Description
Animas-La Plata
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
1/26/2000
Title
Agenda Item 23j Colorado River Basin Issues - Animas-La Plata Project
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Board Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />to <br />en <br />N <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />c <br /> <br />Chairman John Doolittle <br />House Resources Committee <br />Subcommittee on Water and Power <br />1522 Longworth House Office Building <br />Washington, D.C. 20515 <br /> <br />Dear Chairman Doolittle, <br /> <br />As you know, the Department of the Interior released last week a draft Final Supplemental <br />Environmental Impact Statement on the Animas-La Plata Project and its relationship to the <br />Colorado Ute Indian Water Rights Settlement Act. <br /> <br />Public hearings are now scheduled for mid-February, and public comment will be accepted until <br />mid-March. It is our understanding that Secretary Babbitt hopes to issue a Record of Decision <br />around the first of June. <br /> <br />H.R. 3112, introduced by Congressman Scott McInnis last fall, is necessary and important to <br />implementation of the ROD. The legislation does not prejudge the outcome of the National <br />Environmental Policy Act process, but it does amend the 1988 Colorado Ute Indian Water Rights <br />Settlement Act to authorize the Secretary to move forward with a final settlement whose <br />allocations of water are different than those called for in the 1988 measure. <br /> <br />Without such authorization in place when or soon after the ROD is issued, we fear that further <br />delays in this long-standing issue will occur. If the legislative authority is not granted until well <br />into the next Congress, opponents who want no water resource development for the Colorado <br />Ute Tribes will call for yet another round of updated environmental studies. The Tribes and the <br />people of southwestern Colorado and northwestern New Mexico have certainly waited long <br />enough. <br /> <br />While the preferred alternative in the FSEIS is a far less project than Indian and non-Indian water <br />users have envisioned, it does meet a critical standard set forth in the settlement negotiations in <br />the mid-80's: that the Ute claims be satisfied with a new, firm supply of water, not with water <br />taken from their neighbors. <br /> <br />A final settlement of the claims of the Southern Ute and Ute Mountain Ute Indian Tribes is long <br />overdue. We respectfully request your a88istance in reaching that final settlement by scheduling a <br />hearing on Congressman Mcinnis' legislation in February or March. The NEPA process and the <br />legislative process should move concurrently as open, public processes designed to reach a <br />resolution this year. <br /> <br />Thank you in advance for your consideration. The States of Colorado and New Mexico look <br />forward to working with you and Congressman McInnis on this important issue. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.