Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, . .. ,,""''''' '8'3 <br />' ...,J~~ <br /> <br />Juniper rights were already diverting water prior to the date the Juniper rights were decreed, <br />The CRWCD decided to allow upstream water users with water rights junior to the Juniper <br />rights to remove up to 65,000 af so as to not penalize junior users for not declaring their rights <br />earlier. <br /> <br />2.2 Endangered Species Act <br /> <br />The Endangered Species Act (ESA) was passed in 1973 and directs the federal government to <br />conserve listed species and their critical habitats, It prohibits federal action that would <br />jeopardize a listed species' existence. Section 7 of the ESA requires that federal agencies <br />consult with the U,S, Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) concerning impacts of their proposed <br />actions on threatened and endangered (T&E) species, Within the Colorado River Basin. four <br />T&E species have been listed under the ESA: Colorado pikeminnow (formerly Colorado <br />squawfish), humpback chub, razorback sucker, and bony tail chub, <br /> <br />In the late 1970s the USFWS first consulted with the USBR under Section 7 of the ESA on the <br />impacts of its water projects in the Colorado River Basin. An attempt in the early 1980s to <br />exempt the Colorado River Basin from the provisions of the ESA failed, However, the ESA <br />was amended to encourage interagency cooperation in resolving conflicts between water <br />resource development and protection of endangered species. <br /> <br />After four years of negotiations, in 1988 the Secretary of the Interior, the governors of <br />Wyoming, Colorado, and Utah, and the Administrator of the Western Area Power <br />Administration signed a cooperative agreement establishing the Recovery Implementation <br />Program for Endangered Fishes in the Upper Colorado River Basin, The goal of the Recovery <br />Implementation Program is to recover endangered fishes while providing for existing and future <br />water development in the Basin. The Recovery Implementation Program provides a means to <br />address these issues in a coordinated manner and serves as a "reasonable and prudent <br />alternative" as defined by the ESA to avoid jeopardizing listed species or adverse modification <br />of their critical habitats, <br /> <br />A Section 7 Agreement and a Recovery Implementation Program Recovery Action Plan <br />(RIPRAP) were developed in 1993, The (Agreement) established a framework for conducting <br />consultations under Section 7 of the ESA on the impacts of existing and future water <br />depletions in the Upper Basin, It also established procedures to determine if there has been <br />sufficient progress in the recovery of listed fishes to enable the Recovery Program to continue <br />to serve as a reasonable and prudent alternative, <br /> <br />2.2.1 Critical Habitat <br /> <br />The Endangered Species Act and USFWS regulations require designation of critical habitat <br />where practicable, usually concurrent with listing the species. In the case of the Yampa River, <br />as well as elsewhere in the Colorado River system, critical habitat was not designated <br />concurrently for a variety of reasons; designation of critical habitat was made on March 21, <br />1994, <br /> <br />Critical habitat has been designated on the mainstem of the Yampa River within Moffat County <br />for each one of the four listed T&E species. The area designated as critical habitat for <br />Colorado pikeminnow is the Yampa River and its 1 DO-year floodplain from State Highway 394 <br />Bridge downstream to the confluence with the Green River (Figure 1), <br /> <br />Draft 07/28/99 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />Ayres Associates <br />