Laserfiche WebLink
<br />OQ-~~'~{2 <br /> <br />1.1' .1 <br /> <br />2.1.2 Water Administration and Rights <br /> <br />The Colorado River Compact of 1922 apportioned the waters of the Colorado River Basin for <br />use between the upper and lower basin states, The Upper Colorado River Basin Compact of <br />1948 has further apportioned the upper basin allocation (among the states of Arizona, Utah, <br />Wyoming, Colorado, and New Mexico), This compact further apportions the Yampa River <br />Basin between Colorado and Utah and stipulates that the Yampa River at Maybell will not have <br />a composite flow of less than 5 million af (mat) for any period of ten consecutive years. To <br />date, the average annual yield is 1.135 maf, and the minimum 1 O-year yield is 9,1 maf, <br /> <br />The amount of water that can be removed from the river is controlled by Colorado water law, <br />An individual, corporation, or government agency can file for a water right to divert or store a <br />certain amount of water for a given project like a reservoir or irrigation ditch, Water rights are <br />granted with a "priority" date based on the time of filing, A water right with a senior priority date <br />has precedence to divert water over a junior water right. <br /> <br />Although the Yampa River Basin is relatively undeveloped in terms of potential water use, it is <br />considered over-appropriated from a water rights perspective, The sum of water rights on the <br />Yampa River is greater than the average annual flow measured at the Maybell gage, This has <br />not been a problem to date because all of the projects with water rights have not been built. <br />Many of these rights are conditional and have not yet been exercised, Conditional water rights <br />are those which have been filed, but not developed, The priority date is based on the date of <br />filing, provided that the filer shows due diligence in pursuing its development of the right. <br />Other water rights have not routinely been exercised to their full decreed amounts due to <br />relatively low demand for water in the basin, As a result, the mainstem water rights of the <br />Yampa River have not historically been administered, although local administration takes place <br />regularly on several tributaries, <br /> <br />2.1.3 Juniper Project Water Rights <br /> <br />Several water development projects were earmarked for future development on the Yampa <br />River based on an inventory completed by U,S, Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) in the late <br />1940s, The Juniper Reservoir was one such project. The Colorado River Water Conservation <br />District (CRWCD) was granted the conditional water rights for this prolect in 1954. The Juniper <br />Project has not progressed further than planning stages because of cost and environmental <br />permitting issues. <br /> <br />The Juniper Project water rights are believed to be the controlling water rights on the Yampa <br />River due to the early priority date of the water right and its location downstream from junior <br />water rights. The original decree for the Juniper Project water rights is Juniper Reservoir <br />(844,000 at), Deadman Bench Canal, and a hydropower plant located approximately five miles <br />upstream of Maybell. The Juniper Project water right could potentially consume 862,000 af of <br />water per year, or 75 percent of the annual flow of the river at the Maybell gage, <br /> <br />The CRWCD agreed to let water users with water rights junior to the Juniper Project water <br />rights divert up to 65,000 af of water before the CRWCD enforced its senior water rights, <br />Approximately 40,000 af are diverted annually under water rights junior to the Juniper rights, <br />Many water users with water rights junior were not decreed until after the <br /> <br />Drpft 07/28/99 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />Ayres Associates <br />