Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'002286 <br /> <br />conducted over two years (1996-97), The study included measurements of physical stream <br />characteristics, such as river width, depths, velocities and habitat components of pools, riffles, <br />runs and other physical attributes of the river as a function of flow, The study also investigated <br />biological components of habitat used by both endangered species and nonnative game fish <br />(catfish and northern pike) in the river. Endangered species studied included humpback chub <br />in Dinosaur National Monument and Colorado pikeminnow from the Green River upstream to <br />Craig, Colorado, <br /> <br />In their 1999 report entitled "Determination of Habitat Availability, Habitat Use, and Flow Needs <br />of Endangered Fishes in the Yampa River Between August and October," Anderson, Irving, <br />Miller, and Modde estimated that rate of loss of riffle habitat, important for Colorado <br />pikeminnow, was greatest at flows below 93 cfs in the Yampa River between its confluence <br />with the Green River and Craig, Colorado, Their recommendation was instream flows in late <br />summer and early autumn should not fall below 93 cfs at any greater frequency, magnitude or <br />duration than they had historically, They further recommended that a water management plan <br />be developed to allow for future water development for humans while protecting instream flows <br />for fishes, <br /> <br />The researchers concluded that flow variability is a natural yearly occurrence in the Yampa <br />River both within years due to rainstorms and in-between years due to longer-period wet and <br />dry cycles, Native species evolved in this highly variable environment and benefit from it. <br />Therefore, some variability is needed for a healthy ecosystem in the Yampa River. The <br />research also emphasized that, if possible, prolonged periods of very low base flows should be <br />avoided, They acknowledged that low base flows occurred prior to irrigation and that very low <br />flows would occur in drought years even if irrigation were not present, but low flows could <br />adversely impact fish during droughts, They concluded that it was best to avoid inducing <br />extended droughts that would not occur naturally and to which the fish have not adapted, Fish <br />may be unable to recover from prolonged droughts or long periods of lower than normal base <br />flows year after year. <br /> <br />3.2 Non-Native Fish Studies and Yampa River Basin Aquatic Wildlife <br />Management Plan <br /> <br />Concurrent with the research conducted on summer low flow needs offish in the Yampa River, <br />the Colorado Division of Wildlife (Division) prepared an Aquatic Wildlife Management Plan for <br />the Yampa River Basin in Colorado, The purpose of this document was to provide <br />management perspectives and recommended actions for aquatic resources and wildlife <br />species managed by the Division in the Yampa River Basin, The objectives of the plan were <br />to: <br /> <br />1, Describe the physical fishery and aquatic resources in the basin subject to management by <br />the Division <br /> <br />2, Discuss policies, agreements and issues influencing the management of these resources <br /> <br />3, Discuss fishery management for specific waters and aquatic wildlife species located within <br />the basin via management categories <br /> <br />4, Describe preferred fishery and conservation management recommendations for the basin <br />and activities which are or will be undertaken to achieve agency goals and agreements, <br /> <br />Draft 07/28/99 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />Ayres Associates <br />