Laserfiche WebLink
<br />002285 <br /> <br />2.4 Yampa River Basin Endangered Fish Recovery and Water Management <br />Plan <br /> <br />Water users in the Yampa River Basin, as well as representatives from the USFWS, USBR, <br />BLM, Recovery Program, and State of Colorado, initiated discussions on development of a <br />basin-wide water management plan based on the 1995 Hydrosphere Feasibility Report, The <br />discussions explored water management alternatives beyond those documented in the 1995 <br />report, Among the new ideas pursued was transfer of storage held by Yampa Participants <br />(owners of the Craig power plant) in Stagecoach Reservoir for the benefit of Craig III to the <br />enlarged Elkhead Reservoir (as much as 6,000 af). This would allow Yampa River instream <br />flows to be augmented downstream from Stagecoach Reservoir and benefit the entire reach, <br />The power companies who own storage in Stagecoach and Elkhead reservoirs and Steamboat <br />Lake have been willing participants in the discussions; they are seeking permit relief for four <br />power units in the valley that have not yet undergone Section 7 consultation. <br /> <br />Subsequent studies to the 1995 report underscored the need for a comprehensive water <br />management plan for the Yampa River Basin to meet present and future needs of both <br />humans and fish, Water users in the basin, the USFWS, USBR, BLM, CWCB, and the <br />CRWCD continue to develop a basin-wide water management plan, <br /> <br />3. ENDANGERED FISH REQUIREMENTS <br /> <br />Numerous studies have been completed on the Yampa River over the past ten years related to <br />habitat and flow requirements for endangered fish species, Planning related to managing <br />non-native fish species to enhance the recovery of endangered species has also been <br />completed. This chapter summarizes these studies and discusses the conclusions related to <br />water management on the Yampa River. <br /> <br />3.1 Summary of Previous Studies on Low Flow Requirements <br /> <br />Several researchers have conducted studies on habitat and flow requirements of endangered <br />species in the Yampa River. Some of the first studies were conducted by Tyus and Karp <br />(1989) to determine flow needs for rare and endangered fish in the Yampa River based on <br />existing knowledge of the fish at that time, A second study was conducted by Modde and <br />Smith (1995) that provided flow recommendations for endangered fish on the Yampa River, <br />including year-round recommendations from the USFWS, The Colorado Division of Wildlife <br />(Division), in filing for instream flows on the Yampa River, also studied low flow requirements of <br />endangered fish in the Yampa River. Each of these studies has different interpretations of <br />flow requirements for fish during the low flow season, The Division determined that 88 cfs was <br />the minimum flow needed to protect the fish environment. Their methodology measured cross <br />sections of the river and modeled changes in river hydraulics, depth, velocity and width with <br />flow. <br /> <br />Subsequent to these studies, researchers, fish biologists and other management agencies, <br />including USFWS and the Division, determined that further information was needed on the <br />impact of late summer flow requirements of the species in the Yampa River. During summer, <br />when irrigation demands are high, river flows can be at their lowest levels, A study of low flow <br />impacts on the riverine environment was initiated to determine flow requirements of each <br />species and what, if any, flow management is required during the summer. This study was <br /> <br />Draft 07/28/99 <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />Ayres Associates <br />