My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11289
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11289
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:16:50 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:52:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.40.A
Description
Colorado River Compact
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
11/24/1922
Author
Co. R Compact Comm.
Title
Minutes of Colorado Compact Commission - Meeting #26
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.. <br /> <br />293 <br /> <br />siJe is content. Hut VJG bave compromised the mnttGr and the clo.uso is adopted. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />MR. EMERSON: Can ,"re refer briefly now, to the matter of tho time of <br /> <br /> <br />year. We have it in /,rticle III, para[iraph (f) in one place. It is first in <br /> <br /> <br />(a) of Article III in the next to the last line of the I'arar;raph, the first <br /> <br /> <br />day of October, ;,rticlo III, paragr2.ph (d). <br /> <br /> <br />CHAli~w\N HOOVIR: It is moved and seconded, I assume, that we change <br /> <br /> <br />the datos in i\rticle III. <br /> <br /> <br />MR. EMERSON: Octobor instead of July. <br /> <br /> <br />CHAImL\N HOOVER: All those in favor say "aye," <br /> <br /> <br />(The motion carried unaniJnously.) <br /> <br /> <br />Are there any other questions on the pact as sett.led? <br /> <br /> <br />MR. C:,LDWELL: Mr. Chairman, it 3eoms to me that. in tho article ,rhich <br /> <br /> <br />vras supposed to Gover definitions, I believe it is "\rticle II, that there was <br /> <br /> <br />a matter left in suspension there with respect to whother or not we needed to <br />use the definition of "apportionment" or "apportioned." <br />CHAJRMAN HOOVER: I agroe with you, we have no longer any use for the <br />definitj_on. All in favor of striking out definition (h) say "aye." <br />(The vote was unanimously in favor of striking out tho said dofinition.) <br />Any other quostions? Are you ready for a vote on the entiro oompact? <br /> <br /> <br />1m. MC CLURE: I f.!OVO its approval. <br /> <br /> <br />JUDGE D,\VIS: I think the motion should bo for onv,ossing. <br /> <br /> <br />MR. MC CLimE: I accopt that amondmcmt. <br /> <br /> <br />Cl-L\TIlMAN HOOVER: The motion is that the compo.ct shall bo adoptod for <br /> <br /> <br />engrossment. <br /> <br />JUDGE DXVIS: I socond tho motion. <br />Cl-L\IRl/fAN HOOVER: Any disoussion? <br /> <br /> <br />1m. CALDWELL: Mr. Chairman, I am not at all satisfiod with Artiolo III; <br /> <br /> <br />but porhaps it has gono too far, and if so I am ontirely out of ordor. That <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.