My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11269
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11269
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:16:45 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:51:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8142.100
Description
Trinidad Project - Studies - Operation Studies
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
1/1/1996
Author
CWCB
Title
Trinidad Background Info Notebook Part 5
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />., <br />.. <br />. <br />Ii <br />. <br />. <br />If! <br />. <br />" <br />. <br />. <br />I! <br />. <br />II <br />. <br />. <br />I! <br />.- <br />II <br /> <br />~ ... ,"<, <br />'1' (," 0' <br />~1. <br />1. <br /> <br />Gauging Stations Required in the Transferred Model <br />Decree <br /> <br />The Project water supply plan required the transfer of an existing 20,000 acre- <br />feet storage right from Model Reservoir to the Trinidad Reservoir site. <br />Following a petition by the Purgatoire River Water Conservancy District and <br />Model Land and Irrigation Company, a decree (Civil Action 19793) was entered by <br />the District Court in Las Animas County, Colorado in April 1965, allowing for <br />the transfer. The court decree provides for protection of 'vested rights, <br />requiring that storage in Trinidad Reservoir be regulated in a manner to avoid <br />changing certain down stream flow conditions. In order to properly monitor and <br />record the flow of water in the Purgatoire River below the project area, the <br />decree established the need for not less than three gauging stations. <br /> <br />The location of these stations was to approximate the following: <br /> <br />a. At a point on the Purgatoire or Las Animas River <br />located immediately below Van Bremer Arroyo; <br /> <br />b. At a point located on Leitensdorfer Arroyo {which <br />would control substantially all of the inflow from said <br />arroyo to the Las Animas or Purgatoire River; <br /> <br />c. At a point on the Las Animas or Purgatoire River, <br />in the canyon thereof, and located near the Colorado <br />Interstate Gas Company pumping station. <br /> <br />These stations were to be installed under the supervision and approval of the <br />Colorado State Engineer. <br /> <br />During review of the Bureau's December 1985 draft Operating Principles Review <br />Report, the State of Kansas Division of Water Resources raised questions con- <br />cerning the Colorado State Engineer's installation and administration of the <br />above gaugi ng stat ions. Kansas poi nted out that the stat i on to be located on <br />Leitensdorfer Arroyo has not been installed and asked about the effect, if any, <br />its omission has on administration of the decree. During our investigation of <br />this issue, Mr. M. E. MacDougall, attorney for the Purgatoire River Water <br />Conservancy District, provided historical background and reference material <br />surrounding the decision of establishing existing stations to accomplish the <br />purpose of the court decree. According to the reference material, meetings and <br />consultations were held between State Engineer Ralph Owens of Colorado, R. M. <br />Gildersleeve of the Colorado Water Conservation Board, Leo Gamble of the Pueblo <br />Office of the Bureau of Reclamation, and J. W. Odell of the U.S. Geological <br />Survey as to the proper location of gauging stations to accomplish the regula- <br />tion required by the Decree. <br /> <br />It was decided at this meeting by all involved parties that the gauging station <br />referred to in c. above is below the point of return of the ditches in the <br />i nvo 1 ved area and clear ly necessary for the State Engi neer to perform his <br />duties. It was indicated that location a. above appears to be in duplicate of <br />location c. unless the purpose for which the gauging stations were to be <br />installed is considered. In this case, it was felt that a. should have referred <br />to a location on Van Bremer Arroyo above the Purgatoire River. This station, <br />together with a station on Luning Arroyo, next upstream from Van Bremer Arroyo, <br />would provide the ne~ded return flow measurement. <br /> <br />53 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.