My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11217
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11217
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:16:34 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:48:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.30.B
Description
UCRBRIP Instream Flow Approprations
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/1/1993
Author
CWCB
Title
CWCB Board Meeting ISF Memos
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Board Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />Four fish species that inhabit the Upper Colorado River Basin have been federally <br />listed as endangered, the Colorado squawfish, the bonytail chub, the humpback chub <br />and the razorback sucker. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is responsible <br />for recovery of these fish, and has maintained since 1978 that a jeopardy situation exists <br />because of habitat loss and other factors and resulting declining populations. <br /> <br />A Cooperative Agreement between the States of Colorado, Wyoming and Utah, the <br />Secretary of the Interior, and the Western Area Power Administration (WMA) was <br />signed in January 1988, which established the Recovery Implementation Program for <br />the Endangered Fishes of the Upper Colorado River Basin (Recovery Program). Water <br />development and environmental groups are participating in this Recovery Program as <br />well. The purpose of this Recovery Program is to recover and delist these four fish <br />while allowing water development in the Upper Colorado River Basin to proceed <br />consistent with state and federal laws. <br /> <br />In proceeding with the acquisition of water for the Recovery Program, the CWCB is <br />responsible for reviewing flaw recommendations develaped by the Service for instream <br />flows. In accordance with Section 4.1.3 of the Recovery Program and state instream <br />flow statutes, the CWCB is responsible for the appropriation and acquisition of instream <br />flow water rights in Colorado for the endangeTed fish under the program. Under <br />Colorado law (C.R.S. 37-92-102(3)), the appropriatianjacquisition of instrearn flow <br />water rights through the Board must preserve the natural environment to a reasonable <br />degree. <br /> <br />The Service has developed flow recommendations for the July - September period and <br />October - June period for the 15 Mile Reach of the Colorado River mainstem, between <br />Palisade and the confluence with the Colorado River, and year-round flows for the <br />Yampa River from Craig to the State line. The CWCB accepted the flow <br />recommendations for the July - September period which were a 700-1,200 cfs window, <br />and has filed for an instream flow appropriation of 581 cis based on a water availability <br />study. The flow quantification methods used in the remaining two studies were not <br />approved by the CWCB, and further studies were recammended. The Service believes <br />its approach is based on the best scientific data available and that no single analytical <br />model or approach is available for quantifying instream flow requirements in all rivers <br />and for all life stages of the endangered fishes. Additionally, the Service maintains that <br />enhanced flows in some amount are necessary for recovery of the fish and that <br />timeliness in flow acquisition is critical to the recovery of these fishes and for the <br />Recovery Implementation Program to serve as a reasonable and prudent alternative. <br /> <br />The State of Colorado has two major concerns related to the protection of flows for <br />recovery of the endangered fish. The first concern is that the science supporting these <br />flow recommendations is not as fully developed as the Board would like to be able to <br />rely upon in appropriating instream flow water rights. The second concern is that <br />~ <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.