Laserfiche WebLink
<br />mouth of the Little Colorado River (mile 61.5); such a , <br />run today is more difficult although possible at <br />discharges above 20.000 ft'/s in the Colorado River. <br />There are subtle implications to these <br />observations. The 1973 flood in the Little Colorado <br />River changed the bar at the mouth significantly: <br />Shoemaker specifically asked us to match Stephens' <br />1968 photograph to verify this. The debris flow out of <br />South Canyon (mile 31.6-R), which occurred between <br />1940 and 1965. could have added significantly to the <br />material in the debris bar opposite Vaseys Paradise <br />(mile 31.9). This relation between debris bars and the <br />parent debris fan represents another documented case <br />of the relation between debris flows and the course of <br />the Colorado River. <br /> <br />Driftwood <br /> <br />Before closure of Glen Canyon Dam in 1963, <br />fires were set by some Old Timers in the enormous <br />driftwood piles lining the river corridor. This activity <br />was undertaken at the request of the National Park <br />Service and the Bure,]u of Reclamation, who were <br />concerned about the effect of driftwood on navigation <br />in Lake Mead. These fires caused a considerable <br />reduction in the amount of dead hiomass below the old <br />high-water zone. Driftwood :Jccul11u!ated over a <br />thousand years (Ferguson. 1971). and its destruclion <br />over a few decades. represents a huge acceleration in <br />the release of nutrients into the atmosphere and into the <br />sands adjacent to the river. <br />The magnitude and number of fires set along the <br />river corridor by pre-dam river runners was large <br />(Table 3). The effects could be seen for years: for <br />example, signs of the 1940 fire al the mouth of Saddle <br />Canyon (mile 47.0-R) were still prominent in 1942. <br />The reduction in uriftwood was substantial owing to <br />the deliberately set fires and subsequent use of <br />firewood for cooking fires. Rigg remembers seeing <br />huge piles of driftwood on every debris bar below Lava <br />Falls Rapid: now, there is little driftwood on these bars. <br />Many Old Timers indicate the decrease in driftwood is <br />one of the major changes in the river corridor. The <br />number of pre-dam fires, combined with the presence <br />of Glen Canyon Dam. may have been largely <br />responsible for the current state of depleted firewood in <br />the canyon. <br /> <br />l_ 'tit> <br />~ .' . .1.. <br /> <br />Another contributing faclor to the reduction in <br />driftwood could have been its use in campfires just <br />after closure of Glen Canyon Dam. During the first 15 <br />years of river running on the regulated river. wood was <br />the primary fuel for cooking. It seems improbable that <br />the large piles of driftwood could havc bcen <br />dimi,nished by typical kitchen use. but Grua remembers <br />large piles that were depleted between 1969 and I <iSO, <br />As early as 1967. Cross II wrote about the abundance <br />of new driftwood introduced to the main channel <br />during the 1966 tributary floods. adding in his notes <br />that "firewood would not be a problem" during the <br />1967 river season. Nevills Reiff thought there was <br />more driftwood now than when she last was on the <br />river in 1972. She also felt the ban on summer wood <br />fires has had a major effect on increasing the amount of <br />driftwood. which now is added only during infrequent <br />tributary floods. <br /> <br />Riparian and Desert Vegetation <br /> <br />Riparian vegetation is a highly valued resource <br />in the western United States owing to its high <br />productivity, diversity of species, and habitat for <br />wildlife. The Colorado River through Grand Canyon <br />had only sparse riparian vegetation before Glen <br />Canyon Dam (Turner and Karpiscak. 19S0: Webb, <br />1996). Tamarisk, a non-native species, was introduced <br />to the westem United States in the late 19th century and <br />spread through the Colorado Rivcr drainage (Johnson. <br />1991), Although Graf (197R) reported that tamarisk <br />spread upstream through Grand Canyon between 1910 <br />and 1923, observalions of the Old Timers. combined <br />with repeat photography and diaries. suggests <br />otherwise. <br /> <br />Riparian Vegetation <br /> <br />All the Old Timers observed Ihe huge increase in <br />riparian Y~ge1aliun along the Colurado River. The <br />change was considered both good and bad: good for <br />shade and wildlife. bad for environmental aesthetics <br />and camping space. The Old Timers recognized <br />tamarisk as the major contributor to the increase. A <br />excellent example of the increase in tamarisk is at <br />Lee's Ferry. Although Graf (1978) claims that tamarisk <br />is visihle in 1923 photographs at this site, we see no <br />evidence of tamarisk in historical photographs of Lee's <br />Ferry or Grand Canyon (including Ihose examined by <br /> <br />18 OBSERVATIONS OF ENVtRONMENTAL CHANGE IN GRANO CANYON <br />