My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11191
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11191
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:16:29 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:47:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.48.D.3
Description
Wolford Mountain
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
3/12/1998
Title
Wolford Mountain Biological Opinion and attached MOU
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Biological Opinion
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />33 <br /> <br />and contribute to further habitat alteration, the Project would contribute to <br />an increase in nonnative fish populations, Endangered fishes would experience <br />increased competition and predation as a result. <br /> <br />Summarv <br /> <br />The Service has concluded that the depletion of water caused by the Project <br />will impact the primary constituent elements necessary for the survival and <br />recovery of endangered fishes in the Upper Basin. Without actions taken to <br />offset impacts. further flow reductions are likely to jeopardize the continued <br />existence of the endangered fishes and adversely modify or destroy their <br />critical habitat, The Colorado River is an essential component of the habitat <br />of the endangered fishes in the Colorado River Basin and is important in <br />ensuring survival of these species in the event populations are lost in other <br />subbasins as a result of catastrophic events such as oil spills. <br /> <br />REASQNABLE AND PRUDENT ALTERNATIVE <br /> <br />Regulations (50 CFR 402.02) implementing section 7 of the Act define <br />reasonable and prudent alternatives as alternative actions. identified during <br />formal consultation. that: (1) can be implemented in a manner consistent with <br />the intended purpose of the action: (2) can be implemented consistent with the <br />scope of the action agency's legal authority and jurisdiction; (3) are <br />economically and technologically feasible: and (4) would, the Service <br />believes. avoid the likelihood of jeopardizing the continued existence of <br />listed species or resulting in the destruction or adverse modification of <br />critical habitat. <br /> <br />Backqround <br /> <br />On January 21-22. 1988. the Secretary of the Interior; the Governors of <br />Wyoming, Colorado. and Utah: and the Administrator of the Western Area Power <br />Administration were cosigners of a Cooperative Agreement to implement the <br />"Recovery Implementation Program for Endangered Fish Species in the Upper <br />Colorado River Basin" (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1987), An objective of <br />the Recovery Program was to recover the listed species while providing for new <br />water development in the Upper Basin. <br /> <br />In order to further define and clarify processes outlined in sections <br />4.1.5, 4.1.6, and 5.3.4 of the Recovery Program. a Section 7 Agreement and a <br />Recovery Implementation Program Recovery Action Plan was developed (U.S. Fish <br />and Wildlife Service 1993). The Agreement establishes a framework for <br />conducting all future section 7 consultations on depletion impacts related to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.