Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />primary and two secondary demonstrational areas have been selected, one <br />of which is within the PSIAC area. <br /> <br />All agencies were poled to determine their needs for research and <br />services the subcommittee could provide to be more responsive. Many <br />significant proposals were received in response to the subcommittee's <br />request. It is hoped that these enthusiastic requests and proposals <br />from agencies will stimulate necessary interest in subcommittee func- <br />tions in order that the committee can be more productive. <br /> <br />Chair responsibil ities were transferred for calendar year 1973 to <br />Mr. Philip C. Briggs, Arizona Water Commission, State of Arizona, <br />Chairman; and Mr. Floyd Farrell, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Phoenix, <br />Secretary. <br /> <br />73-1 Meeting - Albuquerque, New Mexico - March 7, 1973 <br /> <br />Mr. Jack Koogler, New Mexico State Engineer's Office, representing the <br />State of New Mexico, was approved by members of the subcommittee as <br />Alternate Chairman for the calendar year 1973. <br /> <br />Members of the subcommittee toured the Bernardo Prototype Study Area. <br />This area is some 65,000 acres in extent and was instrumented in 1961 <br />to determine water. use by phreatophytes for the ensuing three years. <br />No attempt has been made to evaluate water use on the project area that <br />has been maintained in a clear status since the Initial estimates were <br />made. It was recommended by the Vegetation Management Technical Sub- <br />committee that, since these water measuring facilities have been main- <br />tained, an assessment should be made to determine if consumptive use Is <br />the same today as it was originally. <br /> <br />Mr. Arthur Potter, Corps of Engineers, reported their project in Arizona <br />at a standstill where there still remains a court injunction preventing <br />the Corps from going forward with the Upper Gila River Clearing Project. <br /> <br />The Bureau of Reclamation is maintaining 50,000 acres on the Pecos River <br />Project in a cleared condition and reported another 20,000 acres of <br />phreatophytes to be cleared on the Rio Grande at a standstill until a <br />revised impact statement has been reviewed and approved. <br /> <br />The Bureau of Indian Affairs reported very little work planned toward <br />vegetation management for this fiscal year. <br /> <br />The USGS terminated field <br />the Gila River Project on <br />completing their report. <br />lished by 1974. <br /> <br />observations and consumptive use studies on <br />June 30, 1972, and is in the process of <br />It is planned that all reports will be pub- <br /> <br />The Soil Conservation Service is cooperating with several State and <br />Federal Agencies to develop and publ ish a vegetation map for the State <br />of Nevada. The committee also was informed by SCS that a program for <br />the collection of desert plants for the stabilization of critical <br /> <br />18 <br />