Laserfiche WebLink
<br />0090 <br /> <br />.,,1" <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Replacement for increased use of water <br />above John Martin Reservoir. 0 . . . . . . . . . . <br />Permanent fish peol evaporationl <br />John Martin Reservoir. . . . . . . . 800 ac-ft <br />Granada Reserveir. . " . . . . . .. --22Q ac-ft <br />Total fish pool evaporation. . . . . . . . . . . . <br />Other evaporation from Granada Resorvoir " . . . . . <br />Additional irrigation usel <br />~dditional diversions. . . . . . <br />Ilddi tional roturnflOVl . . . . . <br /> <br />Net irrigation depletion . . . . <br /> <br />2,400 ao-ft <br /> <br />1,700 ac-ft <br />3,400 ac-ft <br /> <br />.. 19,100 ao-ft <br />. . Jd7 ~600 ac-ft <br /> <br />. . . . . .. . . 11.~qQ ac-ft <br /> <br />.!.2j;al_.l?,robable dep19!i~n . , "..!-' . , . . .. . . 19 sOOO ac-ft <br />f!J The increased return flow is estimated to be 40 porcnn'::. 0f <br />the increased irrigatien supply of 19,100 acro..foet. <br /> <br />The depletion would be greatest d~ring years having large rIooe runoff <br /> <br />and lovmst during years of low flow. Ne attempt has been made to evaluate <br /> <br />the natural channel lesses belovr the state line and the possible salvage <br /> <br />of such losses by operation of a Granada Reservoir. Such salvage of <br />ohannol losses would roduce the dopletionfigures shown above. . <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />-3- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />