My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11162
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11162
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:16:23 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:46:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8149.910
Description
Miscellaneous Small Projects and Project Studies - Granada Project
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
4/1/1954
Author
Unknown
Title
Granada Project - Reconnaissance Hydrologic Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Replacement for maximum operation of <br />Trinidad Reservoir Project. . . . 0 o. . . '. .. 2,400 ac-ft <br />Increased irrigation use below John <br />Martin Reserveir. . . . . .,.....0 . . . . .. . . 19,100 ac-ft <br />Replacement of evaporation losses from perma- <br />nent fish pool in John Martin Reservoir . . 0 . <br />Granada Reservoir evaporation . . . . . . . . . . <br />Increased John Martin Reservoir spills. . . . . . . <br /> <br />800 ac-ft <br />4,300 ac-ft <br />400 ac-ft <br /> <br /> <br />0089 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2. permit the maintenance of a permanent fish pool in <br />John Martin Reservoir by replacement of depletions by evapo- <br /> <br />ration from such permanent pool, <br /> <br />3, conserve flows in the Arkansas River now being lost <br /> <br />by Garden City. <br /> <br /> <br />A permanent fish pool of 7,500 acre-feet in John Martin Reservoir <br /> <br /> <br />and 3,000 acre-feet in Granada Reservoir would be provided. Additional <br /> <br /> <br />irrigation use to be served from Granada Reservoir was assumed to be <br /> <br />60 percent in Colorado and 40 percent in Kansas. Additional use above <br />Granada Reservoir could not be served direct but would be accomplished <br /> <br />by exchange with John Martin Reservoir - deliver John Martin Reservoir <br /> <br />state line requirements from Granada Reservoir while Granada require- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ments above the reservoir would be delivered from John Martin Reservoir. <br /> <br />The reservoir operation studielil indicate that with a storage capac- <br /> <br />ity of 30,000 acre-feet the Granada Reservoir could provide an average <br />annual water supply for the purposes shown in the following tabulation! <br /> <br />Total average annual water. .. <br /> <br />. . . . <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />. . . 27,000 ac-ft <br /> <br />The Granada Reservoir Would be operated in accordance with the <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />existing John Martin Reservoir and in accordance with the provisions of <br />the Arkansas River Compact. Some depletions of Arkansas River flows <br />would result from the increased use of water by the project as shown <br />in the following tabulation: <br /> <br />-2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.