Laserfiche WebLink
<br />51 <br /> <br />c:> <br />Co\) <br />0') <br />c.c <br /> <br />exist in international law with respect to the use of systems <br />of international waters and contained certain conclusions <br />bclieved to be principles of international law in accordance <br />with which an international tribunal would pronounce judg- <br />ment. Among other principles, the memorandum concluded: <br /> <br />3(a) A t'ipal'ian which proposes to mako; o'r allow, a <br />change in the existing regime of a system of inter- <br />national waters which could interfere with the realiza- <br />tion by a coriparian of its right to share on a just and <br />reasonable basis in the use and benefits of the system, <br />is under a duty to give the co riparian an opportunity <br />to object. <br /> <br />(b) If the coriparian, in good faith, objects and <br />demonstrates its willingness to reach a prompt and <br />just solution by the pacific means envisaged in article' <br />33(1) of the Oharter of the United Nations, a riparian <br />is undcr a duty to refrain from making, or allowing, <br />such change, pending agreement or other solution." <br /> <br /> :1 <br /> it <br /> , <br /> ,. <br />i. <br />, ~ <br /> I <br /> I <br />. I <br />I <br />I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> !l' <br /> I <br /> , <br /> I <br /> <br />4. Conclusion <br /> <br />It seems clear that customary international law requires <br />a state to prevent its territory from being used to the in- <br />jury of another state. Authorities are few with respect <br />to the question of pollution. Relying upon the principle <br />of the Trail Smelter decision as well as principles set forth <br />in Suprcme Oourt cases concerning interstate disputes <br />among states of the United States, it is probable that a <br />state is responsible under international law for artificial <br />pollution of waters of an international stream which causes <br />substantial damage to lower riparians. It would thus <br />appcar that if the artificial introduction of highly saline <br />groundwater from the Wellton-Mohawk drainage program <br />were clearly shown to be responsible for substantial <br />damage to lands or crops in Mexico, an international <br />tribunal would declare such conduct to be in violation of <br />customary international law. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.. Id. at 90~91. <br /> <br />~-""",......,....~...,~-.-,.....-~ '."~- ~~.-^ <br /> <br />'-';;'---' <br /> <br />'".', ~:\i ~--;:. ~,i~; '1 <br /> <br /> <br />, T----.,~~-''';-',"-~w'''....y''':'7""''~_..,rr.,'.,,;:o;';;.,,:''?_''~t'''_~,. 0,", <br /> <br />f <br />t <br /> <br />, <br />