Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I' <br />,I <br />I <br />t, <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />l' <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />II, <br />,J <br />It, <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />I <br />I, <br />,I <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />with two species, the Colorado squawfish and razorback sucker <br />being threatened with extinction. One other species, the <br />bony tail , appears to be extinct in the San Juan River. <br /> <br />1.3.3 Consultation History <br /> <br />The Colorado squawfish and the humpback chub were listed in 1967 <br />as endangered. Since the passage of the Endangered Species Act <br />of 1973, two other species of Colorado River fishes have been <br />listed as endangered; bony tail (1980), and razorback sucker <br />(1991). As required under section 7 of the Endangered Species <br />Act all actions of federal agencies that may affect these listed <br />species must undergo consultation with the U.S. Fish and wildlife <br />Service. This is to insure that actions undertaken by a federal <br />agency are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of <br />listed species. <br /> <br />Since 1977, consultations have been conducted between the Service <br />and various federal agencies. The most significant of these <br />consultations have been between the Service and the Bureau of <br />Reclamation and the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Several <br />consultations in the late 1970's and early 1980's resulted in no- <br />jeopardy biological opinions. However, these consultations were <br />based on limited information, before recovery goals were defined <br />for the species, and prior to the recognition of the importance <br />of the San Juan River populations of Colorado squawfish and <br />razorback sucker to the overall survival of each species. <br /> <br />Two major projects since the early 1980's that have undergone <br />section 7 consultation with the Service are the Animas-La Plata <br />Project ("ALP") and Navajo Indian Irrigation Project ("NIIP"). <br />During the section 7 process for ALP, the importance of the San <br />Juan River population of endangered fish species was re- <br />evaluated. The resulting "reasonable and prudent alternative" <br />for the project was based on the premise that current and <br />cumulative adverse conditions of the San Juan River jeopardized <br />the continued existence of the species. In spite of the existing <br />riverine conditions, however, a small reproducing population of <br />Colorado squawfish persisted and razorback sucker was documented <br />in the river. <br /> <br />The impacts discussed in the biological opinion for ALP focused <br />on water depletion. However, other impacts associated with water <br />development such as water quality degradation, contaminants from <br />irrigation return flows, increased sediment, and temperature <br />changes were also discussed. The same impacts were discussed and <br />addressed in the Biological Opinion for NIIP. <br /> <br />It was recognized that while these impacts may be exacerbated by <br />continued development of the waters of the San Juan River, a <br />program or plan is needed whereby all entities that have a <br />