My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10998
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:15:36 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:39:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8135.300
Description
Ditch Companies - Catlin
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
1/1/1975
Author
Richard Luckey USGS
Title
US Department of the Interior - Geological Survey - Hydrologic Effects of Reducing Irrigation to Maintain a Permanent Pool in the John Martin Reservoir - Arkansas River Valley - Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />0729 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />The results from each month of simulation are as follows: <br /> <br />1. Surface-water diversions for each canal. <br /> <br />2. Ground-water diversions under each canal. <br /> <br />3. Streamflow at the State line. <br /> <br />4. Change in ground-water storage by reach and side of the <br /> <br />river. <br /> <br />5. Contents of John Martin Reservoir and the amount of water <br /> <br />assigned to the permanent pool. <br /> <br />6. Return flow to the river and change in storage in the <br /> <br />----i <br /> <br />ground-water system for all future months due to operation during all <br /> <br />preceding months and the present month. <br /> <br />Assumptions <br /> <br />.: <br /> <br />The. si~t;l.3.tiar. ',.'25 dOTle t'oJic:e~ once undt2r non:.al opc.rati.cn .::J.~d c~ce <br /> <br />--..l <br /> <br />with the proposed change in use of water. All data and operating procedures <br /> <br />were the same for both simulations except as noted below. The difference <br /> <br />bet>leen the simulations is a measure of the hydrologic effects of the <br /> <br />proposed change in ~ater use. <br /> <br />The Division of Wildlife has a right to 11.2" percent of the water <br /> <br />diverted by the Catlin Canal. Under the change in water use simulation, <br /> <br />11.24 percent of the direct diversion by the canal was assigned to the <br /> <br />Division. llowevcr, because this water was historically applied 35 <br /> <br />irrigation water with resulting return f~ow, only the consumptive use of <br /> <br />this water was allowed to be transferred in this simulation. The <br /> <br />consumptive use was estimated to be 77 percent (Taylor and Luckey, <br />-- -- -- - -_.- .. - <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />1972) . <br /> <br />The remaining 23 percent of the water was returned to thc river <br /> <br />---.. .------- - --- <br /> <br />-,-- -----+ <br /> <br />.~~--~.' -. <br /> <br />to replace the historical return flow. <br /> <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.