My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10974
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10974
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:15:29 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:38:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.143.J
Description
Smith Fork (Crawford) Project
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
5/1/1958
Author
Dept of Agriculture
Title
Report of Reappraisal of Direct Agricultural Benefits and Project Impacts-Smith Fork Project
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />r--- <br />00 <br />r:. <br /> <br />CHAPTER II <br /> <br />c <br /> <br />EVALUATION OF DIRECT AGRICULTURAL BENEFITS TO BE <br />EXPECTED FROM 1HE 9'!ITH FORK PROJECT <br /> <br />In evaluating the direct agricultural benefits to be expected from the <br />Smith Fork project, the project plans outlined by the Bureau of Reclamation <br />served as a basis for the study. The report is based on the proposed <br />project facilities and the lands which they will serve. <br /> <br />Consideration was given to the following: <br /> <br />1. Project soils and their suitability for irrigation. <br />2. Irrigation water supplies and requirements. <br />3. Necessary land and farm irrigation development. <br />4. Evaluation areas. <br />5. Size and type of farming, together wi th anticipated crops and <br />crop yields. <br />6. Farm income po tentials. <br />7. Direct agricultural benefits. <br /> <br />Evaluation Areas <br /> <br />To facilitate the presentation of basic agricultural data and to assist in <br />the reapprai sal of di rect agri cultural benefi ts, pro ject lands were grouped <br />into five evaluation areas. (Table 1) The soils, climate, water supply and <br />markets within each evaluation area reflect similar crop adaptations, pro- <br />ductivity, land and irrigation development and production costs. <br /> <br />Nonirrigated lands proposed to receive project water are interspersed <br />throughout evaluation areas A, B, C and D wi th the exception of the nonirrigated <br />lands in evaluation area D. These tracts are scattered and not large enough <br />to make new farm units so they will probably be added to existing farm units. <br />The nonirrigated lands described in evaluation area D are analyzed separately <br />because they consi ti tute the largest area of nonirrigated land in the project <br />and will probably provide the only new farm units. <br /> <br />Table 1. - Irrigable acreage by evaluation areas, Smith Fork project <br />Project lands Evaluation areas <br />A B C D E To tal I <br /> - - - - - - - Acres - - - - - - - - <br />Presently irrigated I <br />lands 1,684 1,916 2,667 653 6,920 <br />Nonirrigated lands 112 318 350 540 1,320 <br />Total 1,796 2,234 3,017 540 653 8,240 <br /> <br />- 4 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.