Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ODn~92 <br /> <br />(December 1982) between the Craig and Vernal district <br />managers were followed. <br /> <br />IMPLEMENTATION <br /> <br />Conformance requirements <br /> <br />All future resource management authorizations and <br />actions, including budget proposals, will conform with (or <br />at a minimum not conllict witb) the plan. All operations <br />and activities under existing permits, contracts, cooperative <br />agreements, or other instruments for occupancy and use <br />will be modified if necessary to conform witb this plan <br />witbin a reasonable period of time, subject to valid existing <br />rights. <br />Implementation of management decisions will be guided <br />by a series of activity plans. An activity plan is done only <br />when necessary to implemen' the more general RMP <br />decisions. It is a more detailed and specific plan for managing <br />resources and actions. Detailed schedules and management <br />actions will be described in each activity plan. Resource <br />specific plans to be prepared include habitat management <br />plans for wildlife, allotment management plans for livestock <br />grazing, watershed activity plans, and cultural r~ource <br />management plans. Site specific management plans WIll also <br />be required for areas of critical environmental concern <br />(ACECs), special recreation management areas (SRMAs), <br />and areas ultimately designated by Congress as units of the <br />National Wilderness Preservation System. In addition, an <br />overall resource monitOring plan will be prepared for the <br />Little Snake Resource Area to identify appropriate locations <br />and methods for monitOring resources. It will also identify <br />coordination procedures for developing and initiating sJlCC!fic <br />monitoring studies and methods for recordmg and evaluatmg <br />data. <br />In addition to this plan, a wilderness study report is being <br />prepared which will identify the preliminary recommen- <br />dations for each wilderness study area. The report, along <br />with a final environmental impact statement on the <br />wilderness portion of this plan, will be submitted to Congress <br />for action. <br />Activities or uses not specifically addressed in this plan, <br />such as small-scale projects (rights-<lf-way applications for <br />rural telephone lines, access roads, free use permits, etc.), <br />will be authorized if they meet legal reqwrements and are <br />compatible with the objectives of each management unit. <br /> <br />Valid existing rights <br /> <br />This plan does not repeal valid existing rights on public <br />lands. Valid existing rights are those claims or nghts to public <br />land that take precedence over the actions in the plan. As <br /> <br />lNTROOUCTlON <br /> <br />an e""mple, a mining claim issued prior to the preparation <br />of this plan in an area withdrawn from mineral entry may <br />be valid. Valid existing rights may be held by other federal <br />agencies or by private individuals or companies. Yalid <br />existing rights may also penain to oil and gas leases, nghts- <br />of-way, and water rights. <br />The management units depicted on the Resource <br />Management Plan Map include areas of split estate <br />(non federal surface ownership over federal subsurface <br />mineral estate), private, state, or other nonfederal lands. <br />However, the management unit prescriptions apply only to <br />public lands (the term "public lands" means any land and <br />interest in land owned by the United States within the several <br />states and administered by the Secretary of the Interior <br />through the Bureau of Land Management, without regard <br />to how the United States acquired ownership ... FLPMA). <br />On split estate lands, management unit prescriptions indicate <br />how BLM will manage the federal mineral estate; they do <br />not dictate surface uses unrelated to federal mineral <br />development. None of the management unit prescriptions <br />apply to private, state, or other lands or minerals not managed <br />by BLM. <br /> <br />In addition, this plan does nOl propose that Congress <br />reserve water rights for Cross Mountain, Diamond Breaks, <br />or any other wilderness study area. While it has been argued <br />that wilderness designation implies water rights, if Congress <br />expressly states that water rights are not reserved for a <br />wilderness area, there can be no implication and no reserved <br />water right. The Wilderness Act and BLM Wilderness <br />Management Policy recognize valid existing rights. In the <br />case of water rights, if any reserved water rights are <br />determined to be established by designation, the priority <br />date of tbat rigbt would be junior to all rights existing at <br />the time of designation. It would, therefore, not preempt <br />any existing water rights. <br /> <br />Further planning or environmental analysis <br /> <br />Decisions in this plan will be implemented over a period <br />of years. In some cases, more detailed and site-specific <br />planning and environmental analysis may he required before <br />an action can be taken. The environmental impact statement <br />prepared with this plan will be used as a base and will <br />be referenced in any additional site- or program-specific <br />environmental analysis. Requirements for additional <br />planning and analysis are incorporated in the decisions found <br />in Chapter II. <br /> <br />Implementation priorities <br /> <br />Priorities have been established for those decisions which <br />cannot be implemented immediately. These priorities are <br /> <br />3 <br />