Laserfiche WebLink
<br />18 <br /> <br /> <br />002254 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The additional water, 1,200,000 acre-feet, required for <br />exchange purposes would be conserved in two storage reservoirs <br />proposed on Trinity River. Helena Reservoir with a gross stor- <br />age capacity of 2,800,000 acre-feet would be built on the main <br />Trinity River downstream from Lewiston Dam. This reservoir would <br />develop an annual new water yield of 600,000 acre-feet which would <br />be diverted to the Sacramento River. Subsequently Eltapom ReseF- <br />voir, with a gross storage capacity of 3,100,000 acre-feet, would <br />be constructed on the South Fork of Trinity River. This reservoir <br />also would develop an annual yield of 600,000 acre-feet which <br />would be diverted to Helena Reservoir with subsequent diversion to <br />Sacramento River. Power generating facilities would be incor- <br />porated with these proposed developments. <br /> <br />Estimated capital costs of these reservoirs and associated <br />facilities are $540,000,000. Annual OM&R costs would be offset by <br />power revenues with a net annual amount remaining of about $12,300,000. <br /> <br />The estimated total capital cost for this prospective plan, <br />including tunnel diversions and conveyance to Lake Havasu on <br />Colorado River, exchange conveyance facilities, and storage reservoir <br />systems is $1,750,000,000. The annual OM&R and pumping costs are <br />offset by power generated with an estimated annual revenue remaining <br />of $9,900,000. <br /> <br />Under this proposal, therefore, the additional 1,200,000 acre- <br />feet of water would be stored and conveyed to Lake Havasu at an <br />estimated average annual equivalent cost of $58 per acre-foot, <br />including interest at 3 percent and amortization of the facilities <br />in 50 years. <br /> <br />The average annual acre-foot cost given is computed by using <br />incremental costs of enlargement of part of the California Aqueduct. <br />Appropriate allocation of costs between the California Aqueduct and <br />the proposed incremental enlargement under this plan may reflect <br />some increase in this acre-foot value. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />This plan contemplates diversion of water from several east <br />side San Joaquin Valley streams by relatively high elevation tunnels. <br />Since this water is now being used downstream, exchange facilities <br />and water supplies will be required. Approval of these exchanges <br />will require negotiations with the downstream water users. Such <br />negotiations could be both lengthy and complex. <br /> <br />The reservoir storage systems and related diversions to <br />Sacramento River proposed under this plan should be authorized for <br />construction and operation by the Bureau of Reclamation as a part <br />of the Pacific Southwest Water Plan even though they will be inte- <br />grated closely with existing and proposed features of the Federal <br />Central Valley Project. <br />