Laserfiche WebLink
<br />17 <br /> <br /> <br />002253 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Plan 5 (Sierra diversion to Lake Havasu)--This plan proposes to <br />divert 1,200,000 acre-feet from the major east side San Joaquin <br />Valley streams, above about 3,000 feet elevation, by a series of <br />tunnels of progressively larger capacity starting at the San <br />Joaquin River above its junction with Big Creck and intersecting <br />the Kings, Kaweah, and Tule Rivers and discharging into Isabella <br />Reservoir. From Isabella Reservoir the water would be conveyed by <br />tunnel to the east side of the Sierra Nevadas to a point about 20 <br />miles north of Mojave. From that location it would be conveyed <br />east and south to Lake Havasu on the Colorado River. Exchange <br />water for the areas now being served by the east side streams <br />from which tunnel diversions are contemplated under this plan would <br />need to be provided. r <br /> <br />This tunnel diversion plan would require a series of tunnels <br />totaling 140 miles in length from San Joaquin River to Isabella <br />Reservoir on the Kern River. Associated with these tunnels would <br />be 11 diversion dams for diverting water from each of the streams. <br />From Isabella Reservoir a 34-mile tunnel would convey the water <br />southeasterly through the Sierra Nevadas to Cottonwood Creek, about <br />20 miles north of the town of Mojave. From this location the water <br />would be lifted 185 feet and conveyed 316 miles through a 2,000 <br />c.f.s. canal to Lake Havasu on the Colorado River. The available <br />head makes possible three power drops in this reach--Newberry <br />Pm<erplant 66,000 kw., 20 miles east of Barstow; Bagdad Powerplant <br />140,000 kw., about 80 miles east of Barstow; and Lake Havasu Power- <br />plant 72,000 kw., at the terminal point on the Colorado River. The <br />capital cost of these tunnel:diversions including facilities to <br />convey the water to Colorado River (exclusive of exchange and storage <br />facilities) is estimated bo be $950,000,000, on a reconnaissance <br />basis, and the annual OM&R $2,300,000 not including cost of pumping <br />energy. The cost of pumping will be offset by power generated. The <br />net power generated is estimated to return an annual revenue of <br />$ 7 , L,OO , 000 . <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Exchange water for the areas now served below the points of <br />diversion on the east side southern San Joaquin Valley streams would <br />be conveyed via the west side facilities. A 3,000 c.f.s. incremental <br />increase would be made in the California Aqueduct from the Delta to <br />Hheeler Ridge Pumping Plant. At that location a new canal would be <br />constructed crossing the Kern, Tule, and Kaweah Rivers, and termin- <br />ating at Kings River. A pumping plant with a head of about 50 feet <br />~ould be required near the Kings River to lift water into the higher <br />elevation Kings River service area canals. <br /> <br />The estimated capital cost for these exchange facilities is <br />$260,000,000 (reconnaissance), including the estimated amount required <br />to offset the adverse effect on existing powerplants below the <br />tunnel diversions. The annual OM&R costs are estimated at $1,400,000. <br />Pumping costs are estimated to approximate $6,100,000. <br />