Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />1-<4 <br />~ <br />('~ <br />Ql <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.:::J <br /> <br />ARBITRARY ASSUMPTION OF <br />AUTItORITY BY THE DEPART- <br />MEN1' OF THE INTERIOR TO <br />PRESCRIBE NATIONAL POWER <br />POLICY <br /> <br />The power sales policy of the <br />Bureau of. Reclamation and its: de-- <br />termination to blanket this and other <br />states with transmission lines are <br />predicated on "Memorandum on Power <br />Policy" issued by the Secretary of the <br />a copy of which is attached as ExhIbit <br /> <br />Interior under date of January 3, 1946, <br />"A,"G <br /> <br />In this memorandum the Department of Interior undertakes to define the <br />policy: of Congress with respect to the sale and distribution of power produced by <br />gover!1Inental agencies, From a diligent .search of the records, we are unable to <br />find th:at Congress has ever adopted a broad power policy or delegated authority <br />to the Department of the Interior to so do. Congress hl>s given authorization of <br />certain policies in connection with specific projects, In the Reclamation A~s, <br />Congress has stated that preference shall be given municipalities and other public <br />corporations or agencies in. the sale of power, but. nowhere has it given the <br />Department of Interior, 0.1' any agency thereof blanket authority: (1) to assist <br />in cre$.ting public authorities (For example see Exhibit "13" attached); (2) to <br />install steam standby; (3) to construct transmission lines - duplicate or other- <br />wise -:to serve publil;: bodies; (4) to integrate hydro-electric plants withm a <br />region, (5) to assume local regulatory powers; (6) to assume the responSibility <br />for de"eloping loads and markets; and (7) to prohibit the making of long-term <br />contracts with private agencies, <br /> <br />With respect to the Bureau's contention, which has no Congressional <br />authodty, that they must construct transmission lines to deliver power to public <br />agencies, we wish to point out that Public Service Company of Colorado, alone, <br />has mo.re than 800 connections serving public agencies. To serve even a small <br />percentage of these public agencies would necessitate the Bureau duplicating a <br />substa/iltial part o.f the Company's transmission system. Ample facilities to <br />serve these consumers have been provided by the Company over the years of <br />their growth, and any money spent to deliver power to them by the Bureau is a <br />wasteful expenditure of taxpayers' money, <br /> <br />J <br />u <br />. <br />;; <br /> <br />This same directive limits contracts with private utilitieS to short- <br />term periods which must provide for cancellation in order to make power avail- <br />able fo.r preference custo.mers at any future date. This means that when a <br />utility purchases po.werfro.m the Bureau o.f Reclamatio.n it must always have <br />available other so.urces o.f po.wer to. supply its .custo.mers'requirements when <br />the BUl'eau withdraws its pm<ler, In co.nnectio.n with cur planning fo.r future <br />po.wer, the Bureau 0.1 Reclamation has informed us that according to present <br />estimates 100,000 Kw of firm capacity from Big Tho.mpson Pro.ject is scheduled <br />to. be available in 1952, but that by 1955 this capacity may dwindle to. 68,000 Kw. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />. <br />. <br />o <br />. <br /> <br />- 9 - <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />i <br />