My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10892
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10892
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:15:06 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:35:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8282.200.10.D.2
Description
UCRBRIP
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
3/5/1992
Author
CWCB
Title
UCRBRIP Program Board Memos Item 15a Transcription
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Board Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Jackson: <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />memorandum however, I will bring it up. Basically the Fish and Wildlife <br />Service will use this appropriation to issue nonjeopardy opinions on water <br />projects in the State of Colorado therefore they need or they believe they <br />need a agreement under which the enforcement and protection of these <br />water rights is clearly spelled out. They feel that for legal purposes they <br />need to be assured that the 581 cfs will be appropriated, will be enforced <br />and will be protected in the 15 Mile Reach. The third recommendation is <br />my original recommendation was--on this matter was that while we <br />recommended that the Board approve and appropriate these instream flow <br />waters my recommendation was that we hold off on filing for these water <br />rights in water court until the issue of historic depletions and sufficient <br />progress are installed and presented to the Board for approval. Mter <br />talking to Peter Evans somewhat yesterday Peter feels that this perhaps is <br />at--you know perhaps sends the wrong message to the Service, that it may <br />be a little bit too strong and a condition on filing the appropriation. So my <br />recommendation would be that--Iet me end there and then go back to the <br />first--maybe I should give you the recommendation. My recommendation <br />is that the Board simply direct us to work with the Fish and Wildlife <br />Service in resolving the sufficient progress issue and direct us to work with <br />the Service on drafting a memorandum of understanding that addresses the <br />concerns of the Service with respect to protection enforcement of the water <br />right. So those are my, basically three recommendations. One, to make <br />an appropriation for 581 cfs, two, to work with the service and develop a <br />MOD that protects the water right and we clearly want to bring that <br />memorandum back to you for review and approval and three that we <br />simply not link historic depletions and sufficient progress to this <br />appropriation but we resolve or make the attempt to resolve these issues <br />as we go along. <br /> <br />Does number three contemplate any holdup in the filing of this final <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.