My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10867
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10867
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:15:02 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:34:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8278.400
Description
Title I - Mexican Treaty
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
3/1/1962
Author
IBWC
Title
Mexican Water Treaty -Appendix E -Water Supply
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br /> <br />"In the future it is our belief that when the demands for water in <br />the United States become more acute there will be no water permitted <br />to be wasted from the Colorado River for power production. We now <br />estimate that in the future the diversion for the Yuma proj ect will be <br />370,000 acre-feet, of which 235,000 acre-feet will be consumed at <br />the land and 135,000 acre-feet will be return8d to the river as return <br />flow. <br />"Senator McFARLAND. That is, the Yuma project? <br />"Mr. RITER. Yes, sir. <br />"Senator McFARLAND. How many acre-feet did you say? <br />"Mr. RITER. A return flow of 135,000 acre-feet. <br />"Senator MURDOCK, It will be below any point in the United States <br />where it could be diverted again for beneficial use? <br />"Mr. RITER, H win be below the Imperial Dam. There might be <br />a possibility that some of that water could be recovered by pumping. <br />I think the previous witness stated that, <br />"Senator MURDOCK. Excluding the possibility of pumping, is it <br />below any point where it may be rediverted [or beneficial use in the <br />United States? <br />"Mr. RITER. Yes, sir. <br />"The next project I wish to discuss is the Gila project, which is <br />located in southwes>:ern Arizona. Construclion was initiated on this <br />project in 1936. OrIginally the project contemplated an area of 585,000 <br />acres, with water to be diverted from the east side of the Imperial Dam <br />through a gravity canal which would be 21 miles long and have an initial <br />capacity of 6,000 second-feet. From the gravity canalIS, 000 acres <br />could be served direct. The bulk of the project area, however, would <br />need to be served by pumping from the gravity canal. At the present time <br />we are constructing the canal to an initial capacity of 2,200 second-feet. <br />"As I stated before; we have to make certain assumptions to arrive <br />at_wbaLthe-1utW:8-de.uclopment-wo..lQ-be~I-f'-the-ent-iFe-Gi-la-pro-j ect <br />should be irrigated, the entire 585,000 acres, 'there would be no water <br />left for Arizona to US8 in the Phoenix Valley, and we believe, there- <br />fore, that Arizona will elect to use part of her water supply on the <br />Gila project and part of it in central Arizona. It IS, therefore, assumed <br />that the Gila proj ect will be developed to the extent of 160,000 acres. <br />Of this 160,000 acres there are now 8,000 acres in the north and south <br />Gila Valleys which are irrigated. The north Gila Valley is irrigated by <br />gravity diversion from the Colorado River. The lands in the south Gila <br />Valley are irrigated by recovery of ground waters, by pumping. <br />"In the Mohawk area there was at one time 20,000 acres irrigated. <br />These lands were irrigated by di verting the floodwaters from the Gila <br />River, which are erratic in occurrence, and only partly irrigated by <br />recovery of ground waters. In 1943 the area irrigated in the Mohawk <br />Valley was only 8,000 acres. <br /> <br />-27- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.