Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />VII. FY 91 Tasks and Deliverables (as described in the approved scope of <br />work): <br /> <br />Complete hydrologic, temperature and sediment analyses; identify <br />important effects of Aspinall Unit operation on river environment; <br />prepare report (30 Sept 1990). Submit report for review (1 Oct 1990). <br />Incorporate reviewer comments into report (15 Nov 1990). Convene a <br />meeting of the Interagency Consultation Team (late November or early <br />December 1990). On the basis of the conclusion reached in the above <br />report and Consultation Team comments, develop a work plan which <br />outlines studies necessary to assess impacts of Aspinall including <br />hypotheses to be tested as part of the proposed studies (30 Jan 1991). <br /> <br />VIII. Accomplishments and Shortcomings in Completing Tasks or Providing <br />Deliverables (i.e. address each task/deliverable identified in VII, <br />above) . <br /> <br />A draft report describing changes to the Gunnison and Colorado rivers <br />was circulated for review in October, 1990 and again in December, 1990. <br />The final of the same report was distributed in April, 1991. The final <br />report outlined the studies necessary to provide the information for the <br />upcoming Biological Opinion on operation of the Aspinall Unit. The <br />final report was used to develop scopes of work for funding in FY 92. <br />Two coordinating meetings were held with the principals involved with <br />research programs and the biological opinion. A consolidated Scope of <br />Work for Aspinall studies was submitted to the Biology Committee for <br />review in Hay, 1991. <br /> <br />IX. Status of Data submission (Where applicable): Not applicable. <br /> <br />X. FY 91 Budget <br />a. Funds Provided: 57 K <br />b. Funds Expended: 57 K <br /> <br />c. Difference: 0 <br /> <br />d. Explanation for any major discrepancy between "Funds Provided" and <br />Funds Expended". <br /> <br />XI. <br /> <br />Reconvnendations: <br /> <br />XII. <br /> <br />The study outline should be reviewed every year by the Aspinall <br />Consultation Team prior to submission of Scopes of Work for the <br />following year. Any modifications to the study plan should be made at <br />that time. ~ <br /> <br /> <br />Signed: a tJ r1L~ /2./.6 h / <br />nnclpa Investlgator Date' <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />