My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10860
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10860
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:15:00 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:34:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8274.400
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control - General Basinwide Salinity Issues - NPDES
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
4/1/1992
Title
Colorado River Salinity Standards Compliance at The La Plata Mine - NPDES Permit NM0029505 - New Mexico
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.~ <br /> <br />-:1} <br /> <br />1-" <br />C:) <br />-,1 <br />00 <br /> <br />identification of entities responsible for each <br />source, if available. <br />4. Description of water rights, including diversions <br />and consumptive use quantities, <br />5. Description of the wastewater discharge, covering <br />location, receiving waters, quantity, salt load, and <br />salinity. <br />6. Alternative plans for minimizing salt contribution <br />from the municipal discharge, Alternative plans <br />should include: <br />(a) Description of system salt sources and <br />alternative means of control, <br />(b) Cost of alternative plans in dollars per ton, <br />of salt removed from discharge, <br />7. Such other information pertinent to demonstration of <br />non-practicability as the permitting authority may <br />deem necessary, <br />c. In. determining what permit conditions shall be required, <br />the permit issuing authority shall consider the <br />following criteria including, but not limited to: <br />1. The practicability of achieving the 400 mg/l <br />incremental increase, <br /> <br />'1 <br />'I <br />',J <br />',I <br />, <br /> <br />1 <br />i <br />1 <br />, <br />A <br />:; <br />, <br />'i <br />, <br /> <br />i <br />~-j <br />-'j <br />j <br />i <br />j <br />,j <br />i <br />. <br />>i <br />i <br /> <br />.l <br />, <br /> <br />i <br />~ <br /> <br />" <br />t <br />. <br />, <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />2. Where the 400 mg/l incremental increase is not <br /> determined to be practicable: <br /> (a) The impact of the proposed salt input of each 'i <br /> :', <br /> alternative on the lower main stem in terms of <br /> <br />tons per year and concentration. <br />(b) Costs per ton of salt removed from discharge of <br />each alternative plan. <br />(c) Capability of minimizing the salt discharge, <br />D. If, in the opinion of the permitting authority, the data <br />base for the municipal waste discharger is inadequate, <br />the permit will contain the requirement that the <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />,il: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.