Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'. -' <br /> <br />r... <br />00 <br />N <br />N <br /> <br />.~ <br /> <br />GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED GROUND-WATER FLOW REDUCTION FEATURES <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />The slurry trench/wall would form a series of basins along the south side <br />of the Wash, as shown in Drawing No. 1297-300-171. The detention basins <br />would diminish subsurface flow, and help retard the tributary brackish <br />surface water as it flows parallel to the sewage effluent flow on the north <br />side of the Wash. High flows of fresh storm runoff filling any detention <br />basin would spill across to the north side of the Wash. Thus, the detention <br />basins would impound ground water and help attentuate fluctuations in <br />surface tributary inflow. <br /> <br />The evapotranspiration capacity of the existing vegetated areas within the <br />proposed detention basins is expected to exceed the annual average <br />tributary inflow. However, the flushing action of intermittent storm <br />runoff is expected to continue to maintain near surface salinity levels <br />tolerable to the vegetation. In effect, minimal changes in existing <br />vegetated or inundated land area are expected within the detention basin <br />system. In some areas more salt tolerant plants may replace existing <br />cattails. The system would be conducive to management (if desired) for a <br />diversity of vegetative communities. Existing wetlands on the north side <br />of the Wash would be unprotected by the detention basin system and subject <br />to drainage by natural erosive processes. <br /> <br />The sewage treatment plant effluent is expected to be less dense at <br />equivalent temperatures due to a reduced salt pickup. At the same <br />temperature, a less salty effluent inflow current in Las Vegas Bay (Bay) <br />may ri se closer to the water surface. The dens ity current may then <br />stimulate greater algae growth. Although increased algae growth may <br />support a more productive food chain to the benefit of the fishery, it is <br />generally considered an adverse aesthetic impact to body contact <br />recreation. <br /> <br />To compensate for loss of salt induced density, temperature of the density <br />current may be lowered. Prior to mixing with Colorado River water in the <br />Bay, the Wash water may be cooled by increased exposure to ambient air <br />and/or Bay water temperatures. Estimates of Wash discharge and salt load <br />are shown on Table 1. <br /> <br />The estimate for salt load reduction for future years depends on the <br />adverse salinity impact of erosion control that may be implemented by other <br />agencies. Evidence to date indicates a reduction in salt pickup with <br />continued headcutting of the erosion channel. Since the impacts of <br />possible erosion control attempts are uncertain, a total load reduction is <br />shown in Table 1 for both erosion control and no erosion control <br />conditions. <br />