Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1} .'. , <br />. <br /> (1) <br /> 00 <br /> (\1 <br /> N <br /> V <br /> Q <br /> <br />April 20, 1984 <br /> <br />LAS VEGAS WASH UNIT <br />CRBSCP, NEVADA <br /> <br />PLANNING PROGRESS <br /> <br />An October 1982 Status Report recommended a salinity control strategy for <br />Las Vegas Wash (Wash) based on preventing waste-water seepage from <br />recharging the ground water. Recent studies indicate that salt loading is <br />induced by the disposal of waste water into unlined wasteways or basins, <br />and the seepage leaches salt from the underlying evaporite deposits. <br /> <br />Reclamation has begun a verification program in the Pittman area which <br />would monitor the ground-water response to the elimination of waste-water <br />seepage from unlined ditches. Installation of a 3.5-mile Pittman Bypass <br />Pipeline began in March 1984 and should be completed in November 1984. The <br />residual 9round-water flow should be diminished but may be more saline. To <br />demonstrate the feasibility of establishing and maintaining native <br />vegetation with available ground water, a vegetation test site is being <br />planned. <br /> <br />An effort is being made to coordinate planning of further salinity control <br />action with plans of county and municipal governments. Several local <br />entities have expressed opposition against a Bypass Channel proposed in the <br />1982 Status Report. The primary issues appear to be: (1) the possible <br />impacts the Bypass Channel would have on the existing and proposed wetlands <br />environment in the Wash, and (2) the possible increased sewage treatment <br />costs resulting from reduction of treatment capability of the Wash. Other <br />issues relate to water rights and Colorado River return flow credit. <br /> <br />In response to local issues and recent changes in the location of salt <br />pickup by the surface stream flow, another salinity control strategy has <br />been identified which involves the detention of ground-water in subsurface <br />basins. Each basin would be fonned by a peripheral trench excavated to <br />bedrock and filled with a high density, viscous, fluid (slurry). Soil, <br />cement, and other additives may be used to make the slurry become a <br />relatively impermeable wall. Development of this ground-water flow <br />reduction strategy began in November 1983, with discussions of the concept <br />with state and local government agencies and adVisory groups. Local <br />response has been relatively positive, primarily because sewage treatment <br />plant effluent would not be diverted from the Wash flood plain. <br /> <br />Reclamation is currently considering a proposed verification program which <br />would monitor ground-water and vegetation response to ground-water <br />detention basins. The salinity control effectiveness and environmental <br />impacts demonstrated by the Ground-Water Flow Reduction and the Pittman <br />Verification Programs would provide essential supporting information for <br />any further plan development for the Las Vegas Wash Unit. <br />