Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Bureau of Reclamation <br /> <br /> <br />Peaking <br />Power <br />Investigation <br /> <br />1 _ . <br /> <br />COLORADO W!\l'ER <br />CO:'lSSRWc;nON BOARD <br /> <br />The Bureau of Reclamation has organized <br />a Plannf ng Team to conduct an <br />investigation of the impacts of a pro- <br />posed Peaking Power Plant in the area <br />known as Dunham Point. The team <br />consists of agencies and individuals <br />interested in the social. economic, en- <br />vironmental and engineering aspects of <br />thi s proposed project. The ff rst Plan- <br />ning Team meeting was held on July 9 at <br />the COlllllunity Center in Dolores. <br />Colorado. The team decided that only a <br />Biological and a Power Subteam are <br />needed at this time. Other issues will <br />be handled by the whole Planning Team. <br />Ken Wilson of the Western Area Power Ad- <br /> <br />August, <br /> <br />1981 <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />ministration (WAPA) leads an existing <br />Power Team whf ch is studyf ng nllllerous <br />peaking power investigations and will <br />al so address the Dunham Point l.kIit. Don <br />Moomaw of the Bureau of Reclamation will <br />lead the Biological Subteam. <br /> <br />The next Planning Team meeting will be <br />held on September 1, 1981 at 7:00 pit in <br />the Dolores Comunity Center, 400 <br />Riverside Drive, Dolores, Colorado. <br />Representatives from Western Area Power <br />Mninistration (WAPA) will describe how <br />the overall power generation system <br />works. Preliminary alternatives will <br />also be d1~11!':;C'{'(1. <br /> <br />. . I <br /> <br />The following is a consolidated, open-ended list of concerns that hav~ thus far been voiced regarding the Dunham Point Peaking Power <br />Investigation. In the first Dunham Point newsletter. we discussed reservoir fluctuations and we will be providing further infonlltion on <br />fluctuations in the future Two concerns - the impacts on wfldlife associated with access. and project alternatives - are discussed in <br />detafl in this issue. The remaining issues are listed on page 3. We will continue to address othe,' concerns in future newsletters. If <br />you have a concern that is not mentioned 1n the following list 01' has not been discussed previously please let us know. Contact Jack <br />Generaux. Planning Team Leader, at the Bureau of Reclamation, P. O. Box 640. Durango, Colorado 81301. telephone (303) 247-0247. <br /> <br />Wildlife Imp'acts <br /> <br />The Biology Subteam will examine the effect of habitat losses <br />(both during and after construction) associated with the <br />forebay area. the penstock and generating unit, disposal <br />sites for tunnel spofl material. and transmission lines, in <br />addition to the problems associated with the access routes <br />selected. Wildlife habitat losses associated with the Dunham <br />Point forebay site are estimated to include approximately 400 <br />acres of vegetati on. Si nce the penstock and generati ng plant <br />would be located mostly underground. little habitat changes <br />are expected for these items. The area will be surveyed and <br />mapped to identify and assess impacts. Management plans and <br />conservation measures will then be developed to reduce poten- <br />tial impacts. In addition to the total planning team, the <br />Biology subteam will address the impacts of reservoir <br />fluctuations. These fluctuations could affect fisheries, <br />shoreline stability. aesthetics, and recreational activities. <br />The Biology Subtel8 intends to complete preliminarY evalua- <br />tions of these various issues by the first of the year. <br /> <br />Wildlife impacts would be a particular problem during those <br />periods when the unit would be operating. Peaking power <br />operations are presently planned for an average of 10 weeks <br />during the sunmer and 10 weeks during the winter months. <br />AdditionallY therl:! would be other t.imes during the year that <br />the plant would be operated depending on the peaking demands. <br />Du:'ing these times, personnel would be at the site daily to <br />monitor the plant and perfom routine maintenance. Also, <br />operation equipment would periodically be moved to and fro. <br />the site. The actual power operations would be remotely <br />controlled, pet'haps from Montrose. Colorado. <br /> <br />A particular concel'n ]'afsed was the effect of constnlction and <br />operation and maintenance access routes. New access routes <br />could allow for inct~ased public access to big game ani..ls, <br />thus adversely affecting the their populations. PreliMinary <br />access routes have been identified and the Planning Team will <br />be assessing the; r impacts. <br /> <br />X -<:} <br />