Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Activity - <br />Subactfvity <br /> <br />I <br />N <br />N <br />I <br /> <br />\, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />II <br />~ <br /> <br />Participants <br /> <br />Subactivity Six <br /> <br />Develop the State <br />Preference Future <br /> <br />State <br />Participants, <br />Group A <br /> <br />IIRBC S ta ff <br /> <br />Subactivity Seven -- Develop the <br />Regional <br />Preference <br />Future <br /> <br />Group ^ <br /> <br />'mBC S ta ff <br /> <br />Subactivity Eight -- Regionwide Review Group B <br />of the Regi ona 1 <br />Preference Future <br /> <br />t,lRBC Sta ff <br /> <br />Subactivity Nine -- Finalize the 11RBC Staff <br />Regional Preference <br />Future <br /> <br />Overview <br />Committee <br /> <br />Subactivity Ten n Documentation of r1RBC Staff <br />the Differences <br />Between the r10d i fi ed <br />r.entral Case and the <br />Regional Preference <br />Future <br /> <br />Designated Responsibility <br /> <br />Evolve the State Preference Future by determining and <br />documenting by time frame (1975-1985 and 1985-2000) and by <br />'ASA or state portion of each ASA (1) state objectives, desires <br />and goals, (~) state socio-economic projections and associated <br />land and water use, and (3) assumption and methodologies that <br />differ from the 'lodified Central Case. <br /> <br />Synthesize subactivity six information and data, a~qreqate it <br />by AS/I, and compare it ~Jith the '10dified Central Case utilizing <br />Figure Six. <br /> <br />Review the results from the Modified Central Case and <br />subactivity six (State Preference Future) and evolve the <br />Regional Preference Future documenting the extent of agree- <br />ment or disagreement in: (1) 'lodified Central Case projection, <br />(2) Modified Central Case assumptions and methodologies, (3) <br />adequacy analysis, and (4) effects information shown in Figure 1. <br /> <br />Synthesize the data and information and document the results. <br /> <br />Review and comment on the Regional Preference Future evolved <br />during subactivity seven. <br /> <br />Synthesize and document the results of subactivity seven. <br /> <br />Finalize the Regional Preference Future and display the results <br />using Figure 6. <br /> <br />Review and approval of subactivity nine. <br /> <br />Finalize the differences between the ~odified Central Case and <br />the Regional Preference Future withi~ each ASA for socio- <br />economic projection and associated water and land use <br />projections, assumptions and methodologies. <br /> <br />1362 <br />