WSP10784 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

C"":i r- e-,J N c: .11. 4) that in /lOIllputing the value of felUng wf,ter for the generl'ltion of secondary energy in any t'ut\U"8 IJdjustm6llt a of rat es the fonnula used el1all be Current price of falling water for firm energy A Fixed e.nil operating costa of gener~t1on 'inn tI'uns~ mission of such rinn energy -1L Cost of finn energy delivered htB from whi ell ahall be subt rect ed Fixed nnd operating cost e of generation and trans- mission directly cpplicnble to secondR~7 energy C Cost of providing, malnte1ning Mil Intenn1ttently opernting standby plenta mlell Bll to make this onergy aR reliable end continuouely 8Vail,ble es firm energy ~ Total costs (except fallinr; water) for putting second,,!,,! energy on a f1nn energy basis ColD Value of MUng weter for secondIJry energy A+B-( ~D) To the first three provisions of this egreement there can be little objection. but it se<.ma probable th~t the #Ourth "rov1sion will prove very oompliceted in operation end that it may provs impossible to arrive at some elements of cost that must be dltl'ived in order to apply the method. The agreement rlth the Metropol1ttm ?iater D1etrict ,.as executef by the Seoretary in tl:e form and vd.th the provisions elrefldy outlined Se those eubm11rtedin the t;pr!ng 01' 1938. es presented at the meeting in Denver. June 10 end 11. 1938. At l! conference held in Hhoenix. Arizona, Deeanber 14 to l1:l, 1933. it developed that there would be no agreEl1lent on besse for estimating competitive rates for Boulder eltergy. Cor:.s1deration Wt'll\ then r.;iven to the proposal to red'lce the ntes by "npropric:te 1a"\islction ('nd after ner:otiation. it 'liAa I'lrl',nged thet 1eo;::lalation .,'ould be proposed by the States \"11ich ,."Quld