Laserfiche WebLink
<br />o <br />m <br />~ <br />o <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />The January 1965 report appraised the water quality conditions in <br />the Colorado River Basin above Imperial Da~ using the period 1941-61 as <br />a base and included data from two points not considered in the 1963 re- <br />port. The 1967 report included 3 additional years of record a'ld included <br />suspended sediment data for six stations. <br /> <br />Changes made in the January 1969 Progress Report included (1) con- <br />sideration of the Ha~ond Project under present modified con~itions, <br />(2) an average of a~out 9,000 acre-feet of water now being used by <br />Cheyenne, Wyoming, (3) the addition of another key station, Colorado <br />River near Glenwood Springs, (4) the net future effects of Upper Colo- <br />rado River Storage Unit operations being limited to evaporation only, <br />(5) elimination of the Marble Canyon Project, (6) addition of the Cen- <br />tral Arizona Project by pumping, (7) addition of the Fort Mohave and <br />Chemehuevi Indian lan~s, and (8) addition of the Colorado River India'l <br />Project. Other additions included 2 more years of record through 1966, <br />discussions of state water qaality standards, industrial wastes, munic- <br />ip9.1 problems, temperature data, a!ld salinity control. <br /> <br />Following, in addition to including 2 more years of record, are <br />changes which have occut'red since completion of the January 1969 rep::Jrt <br />and which are incorporated in this report: (1) showing present m::Jdi- <br />fied flows and corresponding dissolved solids only on a mean annual ba- <br />sis (1941-63) rather than on a year-by-year, month-by-month basis; <br />(2) eliminating the Green River near Ouray, Utah, station; (3) consid- <br />ering Silt and Emery County Projects as existing rather than future <br />projects; (4) including estimated average reservoir evaporation losses <br />not reflected in historic records as a part of present modified flows; <br />(5) showing only "Historical, Present Modified, and F<lture" con~itio~,s <br />on the Summary Table No. 18; and (6) addition of discussions of agri- <br />cultural wastes, mine drain9.ge, dissolved oxygen, pH, toxic materials <br />including pesticides, heavy metals, nutrients, an~ radioactivity. <br /> <br />In order to keep each report self-contained, it has been neces- <br />sary to include some of the text material and tables from these previ- <br />ous rep::Jrts in this fifth progress report dated January 1971. <br /> <br />C. Cooperation <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />This report was prepared by the Bureau of Reclamation with assist- <br />ance of the Geological Survey and Federal Water Quality Administration. <br />The Geological Survey provided most of the basic data and prepared some <br />of the sections of "Basic Studies." A continuing cooperative program <br />between the Bureau of Reclamation and the Survey for the collection of <br />streamflow quality data and the exchange of information has been in ef- <br />fect for a number of years. This cooperation provides for the collec- <br />tion of data at stations other than those normally maintained by the <br />Survey. The Federal Water Quality Administration who collects samples <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />