My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10636
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10636
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:14:01 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:25:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
7630.175
Description
Wild and Scenic-Dolores River
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
1/1/3000
Title
Dolores Study-Wild and Scenic-Corresp Reports tech etc 1968-81-Update on the Colorado Wild and Scenic River Study-Draft
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />, ' <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MOAB, UTAH 7/7/76 <br /> <br />Twenty-four people participated in the Moab meeting. Fifty-one <br />items of concern or recommendation were submitted by the partici- <br />pants. Of these fifty-one, the following items received the most <br />attention. These items are listed in decreasing order of priority <br />as determined by the participants' combined input. <br /> <br />1. Exclude uses which consume, modify river bank resources and <br />H20 quality, e.g., oil and gas, minerals, coal, oil shale. <br /> <br />8. Need a wider corridor than proposed. <br /> <br />2. What plans are in order for proposed development; i.e., <br />marinas, dams, roads, mining activity, power development? <br /> <br />3. What kind of active vote will we have in final say and what <br />effect can we have on final management planning? <br /> <br />4. What effect will designation status have on rIver- running <br />opportunities (commercial and private); and how will this be deter- <br />mined--allocations, number of people, allotments, etc.? <br /> <br />5. How [will] designation change BLM present management? <br /> <br />6. Control adj acent land so as to preserve "Wild and Scenic" <br />values. <br /> <br />7. Too much government control. <br /> <br />Note: Items 1 and 2 had equal priority ratings as did Items 3, 4, <br />5 and 6. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The majority of comments submitted reflect concerns that overJRp <br />or fall within the following general categories; regulations govern- <br />ing river management (more than 30% of the comments fell within this <br />category), river classification recommendations, and impacts on <br />present and future land use. <br /> <br />0632 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.