My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10624
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10624
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:13:57 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:25:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8271.300
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - General Information and Publications-Reports
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
8/1/1981
Title
Role of Sediment in Non-Point Source Salt Loading Within the Upper Colorado River Basin
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
233
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />24 <br /> <br />UJ required to fill the water sample. Timing of each of the runs <br />-...l <br />ru started when water introduction was complete and the water surface <br />CO <br /> <br />was in contact with the rotating disc. <br /> <br />EC was measured by withdrawing a water sample from the lowest <br /> <br />port (just above the bed) at specified time intervals, Samples were <br /> <br />taken at 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 105 and 120 <br /> <br />minutes and their temperature was also recorded, They were returned <br /> <br />to the flow cylinder by pouring over the disc as in the beginning <br /> <br />of the run. The volume required for a measurement was approximately <br /> <br />0.5 liters or about 13% of the total water in the cylinder. Each <br /> <br />sample took between thirty and forty-five seconds from the time the <br /> <br />sample was removed (and the flow stopped) and returned. Losses <br /> <br />during the sampling were generally insignificant, At the completion <br /> <br />of the run, the soil surface was changed by as much as 20 mm from <br /> <br />the original level, This was mostly the result of water intro- <br /> <br />duct ion and returning of samples. A separate run (W-4b) with only <br /> <br />one sample taken at completion (120 minutes) was done to check this <br /> <br />effect. Repeatability was also checked by doing three runs at the <br /> <br />same speed (W-3a, b, c). Between each EC sample, the motor speed <br /> <br />was measured so that a consistent value could be maintained, The <br /> <br />motor was connected to a variable-speed controller for this purpose. <br /> <br />2.l.lc Velocity Measurement <br /> <br />Average velocity for the depth of flow was measured by injecting <br /> <br />dye through a port and timing its movement, The window in the side <br /> <br />of the flow cylinder was adjacent to the upstream side of the injec- <br /> <br />tion point, The dye was viewed just as it completed one revolution. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.