My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10622
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10622
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:13:56 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:25:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.100.50
Description
CRSP - Power
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
11/15/1960
Author
Engineering Comm.
Title
Revenue Requirements of Colorado River Storage Project Transmission System
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />"During the April subcoDmlittee hearings, the utilities' claimed <br />that, as a result of accepting their offers to wheel Project energy, some <br />$4 million would accrue to state and federal treasuries in the form <br />of added tax revenues. This statement cannot be even approximately <br />reconciled with the utility transmission system investment proposed, <br />expected revenues from utility wheeling offers, and past records of utility <br />financial operations as reported to the Federal Power COI1DDission." <br /> <br />"----past utility records of the Federal Power COI1DDission show <br />utilities in this area devote about 22% of their annual gross revenues to <br />federal and local taxes. Applying this percentage to the $8 million <br />wheeling revenues gives a total tax figure of only about $1.76 million <br />annually, or roughly $176 million for the 100 year period being studied." <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />"For the privilege, then, of paying less than $2 million of <br />taxes through power revenues instead of other means, consumers would be <br />asked to pay between $5 and $6 million more for power. The advantages <br />of the all-federal system thus far outweigh those of the combination <br />system even when tax differences are considered." <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />In summary, this report demonstrates conclusively that <br />the all-federal system: <br /> <br />1. Complies fully with all congressional and departmental <br />criteria and the authorizing legislation. <br /> <br />2. Provides tremendous economic superiority over the <br />system proposed by the utilities. <br /> <br />3. Safeguards the financial feasibility of participating <br />projects constructed under Public Law 485. <br /> <br />We, the preference customers in the five-state market <br />area established by you --- the customers for all storage project power <br />down through the years --- believe that our recoDmlendations and desires in <br />the matter of who builds the transmission system should control, as, in <br />the final analysis, we will pay, not only for these lines, but ahnost 90% <br />of the cost of the entire Storage Project. <br /> <br />Our unqualified recOl1DDendation is that the system be an all- <br />federal one, and that you so determine at the earliest possible date. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Yours very truly, <br /> <br />COLORADO RIVER BASIN CONSUMERS POWER, INC. <br /> <br />"n1~ ffZi- ~~ <br /> <br />Marion M. Wilson <br />President <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.