My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10584
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10584
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:13:43 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:24:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8149.910
Description
Miscellaneous Small Projects and Project Studies - Granada Project
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
4/1/1961
Author
Bureau of Reclamatio
Title
Status and Inventory Report - Granada Project and Arkansas River Basin Below John Martin Reservoir - Colorado and Kansas
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />13 <br /> <br /> <br />OQ,2~ <br /> <br />The Kansas ditch requirements were estimated at an averaGe of <br /> <br />119,000 acre-feet. The average annual surplus State line flow <br /> <br />amounted to 123;000 acre-feet for the same period. Water for <br /> <br />increased use in Kansas would be obtained from those flows at <br /> <br />the State line which are surplus to the requirements of water <br /> <br />users in Kansas above Garden City. These surplus flows consist <br /> <br />principally of winter irrigation returns and summer flood flows <br /> <br />originating either below or spilling from John Martin Reservoir. <br /> <br />A reservoir of large capacity located near the Colorado-Kansas <br /> <br />State line would be required to completely control all the <br /> <br />surplus flood flows, because of their magnitude and erratic <br /> <br />occurrence. Historic flows during the years 1921, 1923, 1924 <br />and 1942 are indicative of this condition. However, periods of <br /> <br />high flows could be utilized to replenish the depleted conserva- <br /> <br />tion storage of any reservoir. <br /> <br />In order to analyze the probable limits of beneficial <br /> <br />diversion from direct flows, the daily discharges of the Arkansas <br /> <br />River at Holly, Colorado, and Coolidge, Kansas, were studied. All <br /> <br />mean daily flows in excess of 3500 c.f.s. were considered to be <br /> <br />too high to be of beneficial use directly from the river. The <br /> <br />figure of 3500 c.f.s. was selected after determining the percent <br /> <br />of time that flows below Syracuse, Kansas were between 3,000 and <br />4,000 c.f.s. Y <br /> <br />!/ Found in "Kansas Streamflow Characteristics Part 1, Flow <br />Duration, Technical Report No.1", published by the Kansas Water <br />Resources Board, June 1959. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.