My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10564
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10564
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:13:36 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:24:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.120
Description
Colorado River Basin States Committee (AKA Colorado River Compact Commission)
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
9/20/1949
Author
CRBSC
Title
Proceedings of the Meeting of the Colorado River Basin States Committee
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />MR. CA~SON: Mr. Chairman, I would like to first make a report on the <br />status of the CFntra1 Arizona Project Authorization Bill. It has now been re- <br />ported faVOrab1[ by the Senate Committee. It has not yet been reported by the <br />House Committee nor has any action been taken on the floor of either House. We <br />deeply apprecia:e the help that we have received from all the members of this Com- <br />mittee and the ~tates here represented and request that it be continued. <br /> <br />We are! faced wi th what we eonsider to be a vicious campaign of propaganda <br />emanating from ~ertain interests in Southern California against Arizona and the <br />Central ArizonajProject, which we think also adversely affects other states in <br />the Basin. We t~hink it is part of the same plan. It is apparently ,very well <br />financed and ve y effective. They have a big propaganda organization and are <br />spending money ,ery freely. They have been sending mats to various newspapers <br />over the country for publication in their papers with illustrations and cartoons, <br />which must costla great deal of money, They are getting out pamphlets--I see Mr. <br />Bliss has one t~ere--which are very misleading and which are, as their whole cam- <br />paign seems to ds, based on half-truths and outright falsifications. <br />, <br /> <br />Now itiis difficult for us to combat it in any'public way or publicity <br />way. We have, ~owever, in the hearings before the various Congressional Commit- <br />tees, made fu11iand complete presentations and we are preparing summaries or <br />synopses and di~tributing them as we can. We are also getting some other articles <br />prepared by ourlGovernor and by some other people, and we have received some ex- <br />cellent supportlfrom these states and people here represented, and various members <br />of Congress. Wq will try to send copies of what we get made available to all the <br />members of this ICommittee and to anybody else that you would suggest. <br /> <br />But we ~rould appreciate your writing us the names and addresses of any- <br />body to whom YOUj think we should send any literature or synopsis or summary of <br />facts or other nlatters. We promise that so far as we are able to determine, <br />Arizona will no~ send anything to anybody except that which is absolutely true. <br />The only way we !know how to fight it is wi th the truth. <br /> <br />Then I had one other thought in mind--and I have not had an opportunity <br />to discuss this kith any members of this Committee--but it seemed to me in <br />Washington last ~pring that there were concerted efforts being made to take from <br />the Bureau of R~c1amation some of its traditional activities on which the develop- <br />ment of the Colotado River Basin and the entire West depends. I conceive the <br />Bureau of Reclam~tion to be the agency for the development of the West upon which <br />we must all rely~ So I think we should take whatever action we can think of that <br />would aid it. 1 <br /> <br />Then rei'entlY I am informed that the President vetoed the Authorization <br />Bill that would uthorize the Vermejo Project in New Mexico, and signed the <br />Authorization Bi,l for the Weber Project in Utah but did so somewhat reluctantly <br />and then only onlthe assurance that the basic Reclamation Law would be amended or <br />the policy there; clarified. <br /> <br />Now neither one of those projects is in the Colorado River Basin; but anv,~ <br />national pOlicy or clarification or formula or financial setup that is made to , <br />apply. generally over the country will of course directly affect developmen~ in all <br />of the Colorado 'iver Basin States. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.