Laserfiche WebLink
<br />/ <br /> <br />, . <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />\ 4-wRW washn x x x development <br />i SllLINI'rY, AIR POLLU'l'ION, OTHER PROBIBKS <br />: 'l'he task force did not underestimate potential salinity problems. <br /> <br />It stated, .Even with tight controls to avoid or minimize water con~ <br /> <br />!nation, the long-term effect of industrialization would result in a de. <br /> <br />cline in wa:ter quality. ..water quality impacts will be focused most di- <br /> <br />rectly'on the White and Green Rivers and ultimately on the Colorado Ri- <br /> <br />ver System. potential for serious degradation exists, but due to the <br /> <br />uncertainties inherent in many of the individual impacts, the degree of <br /> <br />0199 <br /> <br />severity cannot not be quantified." <br />Colorado's stiff air quality standard--lO micrograms per cubic met- <br />er of air for sulfur dioxide by 1980--would preclude oil shale develop- <br />ment in the piceance Basin in Western Colorado beyond 200,000-300,000 <br />BPD, "about the production level that may be achieved under prototype <br />development,. the report said. Also the Environmental protection Agencl <br />must determine what constitutes "significant deterioriation" of air qua! <br />, ity, on orders from the federal courts. . Prevention of "sigificant de- <br />'terioration"of air qUality has been written into the four test leases, <br /> <br />and EPA's determination on this point <br />,'.... ..,,,' o.il ,.f!:h:ale but, anY roiner!lLdevelopment <br />said. (Other areas would, of course, <br /> <br />will directly affect "not only <br />in COlorado, utah or Wyqming," it <br /> <br />be affected too.) <br /> <br />An EPA spokes- <br />this point <br /> <br />man told WRW on JUly 9 EPA will <br /> <br />"Within the next IIIOnth.. <br /> <br />New,lease soales of public lands would have to be made between 1977- <br /> <br />1980 to accelerate oil shale development, the task force said. Acreage <br /> <br />would have to be larger than the present 5!20-acre tracts to assure suc- <br />it J?01nted out. <br />cessful lease sales, especially in utah and Wyom1ng,/ Perhaps oil shale <br /> <br />lands should be leased by a reserves unit rather than by acreage, it sug <br /> <br />gested. This would require a change in the law. other problems in ac- <br />celerating oil shale development are the same as for any minerals devel- <br />opment: making the resource attractive enough to attract venture capit- <br />al, meeting power needs (~OO,OOO to 700,000 kilowatts), shortage of en- <br />gineering talent, some types of craftsmen, notably pipefitters, equip- <br />ment and materials shortagesr rising costs of everything, especially <br />labor and equipment; long delivery timeson vital equipment, difficultieE <br />in planning for and providing for new facilities and public services <br />in the affected areas to meet the n~ds of the increased population.~ <br /> <br />announce its decision on <br />