My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10517
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10517
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:13:22 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:21:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8273.100
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control - Federal Agencies - Bureau of Reclamation
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
3/6/1984
Title
Status of Colorado River Water Quality Improvement Program and Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project - Upper Colorado Region - Bureau of Reclamation
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />" <br />" <br />STATUS <br />1-' <br />C.'l <br />ell <br />~ <br />~_.. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I11fvr~ 7} J1jy <br /> <br />OF COLORADO RIVER WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND <br />COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL PROJECT' <br />UPPER COLORADO REGION, BUREAU OF RECLAMATION <br />FORUM WORK GROUP MEETING <br />MARCH 6- 7, 1984 <br />SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO <br /> <br />ft-u: <br />fA sfP f?" <br /> <br />BIG SANDY RIVER UNIT, WYOMING <br /> <br />1. On October 31, 1983, the Draft Planning Report/Advance Draft Environmental <br /> <br />Statement was sent to the State and Federal agencies and concerned private <br /> <br />companies for a field level review. The recommended plan was to deliver <br /> <br />water to Chevron and Texasgulf Chemical Companies. <br /> <br />2. Chevron Chemical Company wrote recently that it does not plan to utilize <br /> <br />Big Sandy water in the first two phases of its proposed phosphate <br /> <br />fertilizer plant to be built near Rock Springs, Wyoming. <br /> <br />3. Texasgulf Chemical also postponed expansion of its plant. <br /> <br />4. On January 6 a letter was written to the Forum requesting a recom- <br /> <br />menclation on future course.of action. <br /> <br />5. Four alternatives were suggested in the letter (1) to pipe water to the <br /> <br />Divide Basin for evaporation, (2) scale the recommended plan back to <br /> <br />coincide with Chevron's projections, (3) prepare the report with evapor- <br /> <br />ation alternative as the recommended plan but not seek authorization, <br /> <br />and (4) conclude the study until problems with water rights, allocation, <br /> <br />and beneficial use can be resolved. <br /> <br />6. Another alternative could be to pipe water to Jim Bridger Plant' for <br /> <br />cooling tower use. <br /> <br />7. State of Wyoming has requested the Bureau continue with a FY 1985 advance <br /> <br />planning start; but to do this, we would need a recommendation by the <br /> <br />Forum to continue with one of the alternatives, complete the report as <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.