Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r <br />, <br /> <br />1,1 <br /> <br />.",-." <br />'" <br />"I <br />I' <br />, <br />; <br />I j <br />r <br />',' <br /> <br />. ri <br /> <br />('-~ <br /> <br />" <br />I <br />[~~t <br />[': <br /> <br />I <br />I' <br /> <br />] <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />J, <br /> <br />~. '-::i <br /> <br />0 <br />0 <br />(-"", . <br />(,.,1 <br />C1) <br />"n <br /> . <br /> . <br /> <br />wolcott (with E~gle diversion only) and Red Mountain <br />Reservoirs <br /> <br />Wolc.ott (with Eagle d,iver$iononly) and Azure Reservoirs <br /> <br />Una, and Red Mountain Reservoirs <br /> <br />Detailed evaluations ot these c.ombination reservoirs were made to <br />estimElte. their yields and replacement capabilities. Besides the <br />three reservoir combinations. that Were analyzed" there are many <br />other possible c.ombinations. For example,.Wolcott Reservoir could <br />be combined wi t:h Wol,ford A I . This combination . would result in a <br />yield. th.atwould be very s,imilar to. the Wolcott-Red Mountain. <br />combination, Such, comparable combinations were not evaluated <br />separ~tely in this hydrologic analysis. <br /> <br />3.2 SEDIMENT STORAGE OR MINIMUM POOL REQUIREMENT <br /> <br />The minimum pool requirements for each reservoir utilized in this <br />study is the s;tructural allowance or the sediment storage <br />allowance, whichever is greater, as d,etermined by preVious <br />investigations. For reservoirs that lacked this information, it <br />was assumed that the minimum pools would contain estimated sediment <br />yields for a 100-year period. Table 3.'1 presented in th<;aprevious <br />section includes information on the' minimum pool fO.r eaOh single <br />reservoir or combination of reservoirs. <br /> <br />, ' <br /> <br />r: 3. 3CON.DtTIONAL STORAGE WATER RtGHTS <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />), <br />T <br /> <br />'-,' <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />Water rights decreed 'or filed for the reservoir sites considered in <br />this study are summarized'. in Table 3 .2. Al though the location of <br />Wolford site A' is different from that of Site A as specified in <br />the water riqht decree, for this analysis it was assumed that Site <br />A' had, the same priority date CiS Site A. <br /> <br />3-4 <br />