My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10443
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10443
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:12:57 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:20:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8281.200
Description
Colorado River Studies and Investigations -- Colorado River Management Plan
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
12/1/1981
Author
National Park Serv
Title
Colorado River Management Plan and Annual Operating Requirements -- Grand Canyon
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />C,) <br />l' ~ ') <br />N <br />to <br />l>t-;o <br />\'S-1> <br /> <br />In 1973, the National Park Service (N PS) initi ated a <br />research program and planning process leading to the <br />development of the Colorado River Management Plan in <br />1979. One major feature of this 1979 plan was the <br />phasing out of motorized craft over a five year period. <br /> <br />Congressional input on this plan was received in 1980 <br />when the Hatch Amendment was passed as an element of <br />the 1981 Department of the Interior Appropriations 8ill. <br />The amendment prohibited a reduction of user days or <br />passenger launches for commercial motorized craft below <br />1978 levels during the summer season. <br /> <br />8ased on passage of this amendment, the N PS responded <br />with a decision to modify the Colorado River M anage- <br />ment Plan to allow a diversity of river running <br />experiences in Grand Canyon National Park. While SOme <br />reevaluation of management goals has taken place, the <br />preservation of the Grand Canyon of the ColoradoRiver <br />for future generations remains a primary objective of the <br />plan. <br /> <br />Public comments received during the four public <br />meetings and through over 600 pieces of correspondence <br />reflected a diverse interest. The prepondera nce of these <br />comments favored some combination of oars and motors <br />while voicing an interest to have a period for oar only <br />use. <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.