<br />:",., ,., ~ 1
<br />'.'. ".,,:1.
<br />
<br />GENERAL EFFECTS OF DROUGHT ON VVATER RESOURCES
<br />
<br />B43
<br />
<br />drought, and production in the driest year was less than
<br />25 percent of the maximum annual production, The
<br />hydroelectric plants operated by the Lower Colorado
<br />River Authority on the Guadalupe River generated
<br />36.5 million kwh during 1949 but less than 3 million
<br />kwh in 1956, because of decreased flow in the river.
<br />Drying of some streams, lakes, and reservoirs elimi-
<br />nated the fish population, but this destruction included
<br />numerous coarse fish too. On the other hand, some
<br />large reservoirs (for example, the Buchanan Reservoir,
<br />fig. 14) held a high proportion of their capacity
<br />throughout nearly every year of the drought.
<br />Emergency activities during the drought have in-
<br />cluded various methods of water rationing, such as lawn
<br />watering at even-numbered houses today and odd-num-
<br />bered houses tomorrow, no car washing, as well as ar-
<br />rangements for hauling water or otherwise obtaining
<br />temporary supplies during the period of shortage. In
<br />some places emergency measures were necessary despite
<br />considerable progress toward development of assured
<br />water supplies for the future. For example, the city
<br />of Dallas depended for many years upon Lake Dallas,
<br />but the storage was reduced by drought so seriously as
<br />to be inadequate by 1953. The city was also allocated
<br />188,000 acre-feet in Grapevine Reservoir, completed in
<br />July 1952, and 415,000 acre-feet in Garza-Little Elm
<br />Reservoir, completed in November 1954, but these reser-
<br />voirs did not fill during the drought. Hence, Dallas,
<br />facing a critical shortage of water in February 1954,
<br />began pumping from the Red River, which was saline
<br />enough to give Dallas the temporary and dubious dis-
<br />tinction of using water that was more highly mineral-
<br />ized than that in any other large city in the Nation,
<br />Comparison of cotton production in 1945 and 1955
<br />illustrates the effect of drought upon the irrigation
<br />economy, although production was influenced also by
<br />acreage allotments and other factors independent of
<br />water supply. In 1945 the total State production was
<br />1,794,000 bales from 6 million acres, or an average yield
<br />of 143 pounds per acre; about 40 percent of the total
<br />was produced in the western part of the State. The
<br />total production in 1955 was 4,039,000 bales from 6 mil-
<br />lion acres, an average of 281 pounds per acre and an in-
<br />crease of 225 percent in total production over that in
<br />1945; about 70 percent of the total was produced in the
<br />western part of Texas, The combination of success on
<br />irrigated farms and crop failures on farms that de-
<br />pended on precipitation produced a marked trend in the
<br />agricultural economy from small dryland farms to
<br />large irrigated farms. In many instances this has
<br />meant a geographic shift, involving abandonment of
<br />small farms and development of new acreage where
<br />ample water supplies are available for irrigation. One
<br />
<br />result of this trend was a reduction from about 330,000
<br />farms and ranches in Texas in 1950 to 290,000 in 1956.
<br />The drought encouraged conservation practices such
<br />as the use or reuse of water that onCe went to waste,
<br />Sewage-treatment plants have converted municipal
<br />waste water for use, and the sewage effiuent from San
<br />Antonio and Lubbock, for example, is used for irriga-
<br />tion, Industrial plants, by recycling cooling water,
<br />have been able to operate with less makeup water or to
<br />expand operations with no increase in intake, Increas-
<br />ing numbers of canals and ditches carrying irrigation
<br />water have been lined with concrete or replaced by
<br />underground conduits since 1945; this practice is of
<br />especial value where the water lost from the canals
<br />by seepage could not possibly be recovered frOm ground-
<br />water reservoirs. In many areas consumptive waste; of
<br />water has been reduced by eradication of such native
<br />vegetation as saltcedar' and water hyacinth. Conserva-
<br />tion is practiced by some people an the time, but there
<br />is more universal attention to it during periods of water
<br />deficiency.
<br />
<br />NEW MEXICO
<br />
<br />The drought of 1942-56 was longer and more severe
<br />in New Mexico than in any other State in the Southwest.
<br />The entire State has been recognized as a drought-
<br />disaster area. In most places even the average precip.
<br />itation is insufficient. for cultivation of crops without
<br />irrigation, but there is some dry farming, principally of
<br />wheat, in the eastern part of the State; as much as 60
<br />percent of these crops fa'iled during the dry year 1956,
<br />The range in all parts of New Mexico deteriorated
<br />because of deficient precipitation year after year. From
<br />1951 to 1956 the number of cattle was reduced each year
<br />owing to scarcity of forage. The seriousness of the de-
<br />pletion of the range by drought has been pointed up in
<br />a report by the Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Ex-
<br />periment Station (1956, p, 61) :
<br />"Over the 40-year period 1915 to 1954 the average ba-
<br />sal density of black grama grass (Bouteloua eriopoda),
<br />the most important forage plant on the rang", on quad-
<br />rats protected from grazing has varied greatly, Density
<br />was reduced to 0,3 percent of the surface area in 1923
<br />as the result of the dry period start.ing in 1916. With
<br />the return of rains, density of black grama again in-
<br />creased until in 1933 it was 9.5 percent, the maximum
<br />for the period of study. As the result of the current
<br />drought, black grama has disappeared from the quad-
<br />rats. The density each year is correlated with the
<br />amount of rainfall received during the preceding 15
<br />months * * *. Such variations in plant cover affect
<br />the livestock production. Over the 40-year period,
<br />. stocking has been virtually eliminated twice as the re-
<br />sult of drought, while in most favorable years stocking
<br />
|