Laserfiche WebLink
<br />:",., ,., ~ 1 <br />'.'. ".,,:1. <br /> <br />GENERAL EFFECTS OF DROUGHT ON VVATER RESOURCES <br /> <br />B43 <br /> <br />drought, and production in the driest year was less than <br />25 percent of the maximum annual production, The <br />hydroelectric plants operated by the Lower Colorado <br />River Authority on the Guadalupe River generated <br />36.5 million kwh during 1949 but less than 3 million <br />kwh in 1956, because of decreased flow in the river. <br />Drying of some streams, lakes, and reservoirs elimi- <br />nated the fish population, but this destruction included <br />numerous coarse fish too. On the other hand, some <br />large reservoirs (for example, the Buchanan Reservoir, <br />fig. 14) held a high proportion of their capacity <br />throughout nearly every year of the drought. <br />Emergency activities during the drought have in- <br />cluded various methods of water rationing, such as lawn <br />watering at even-numbered houses today and odd-num- <br />bered houses tomorrow, no car washing, as well as ar- <br />rangements for hauling water or otherwise obtaining <br />temporary supplies during the period of shortage. In <br />some places emergency measures were necessary despite <br />considerable progress toward development of assured <br />water supplies for the future. For example, the city <br />of Dallas depended for many years upon Lake Dallas, <br />but the storage was reduced by drought so seriously as <br />to be inadequate by 1953. The city was also allocated <br />188,000 acre-feet in Grapevine Reservoir, completed in <br />July 1952, and 415,000 acre-feet in Garza-Little Elm <br />Reservoir, completed in November 1954, but these reser- <br />voirs did not fill during the drought. Hence, Dallas, <br />facing a critical shortage of water in February 1954, <br />began pumping from the Red River, which was saline <br />enough to give Dallas the temporary and dubious dis- <br />tinction of using water that was more highly mineral- <br />ized than that in any other large city in the Nation, <br />Comparison of cotton production in 1945 and 1955 <br />illustrates the effect of drought upon the irrigation <br />economy, although production was influenced also by <br />acreage allotments and other factors independent of <br />water supply. In 1945 the total State production was <br />1,794,000 bales from 6 million acres, or an average yield <br />of 143 pounds per acre; about 40 percent of the total <br />was produced in the western part of the State. The <br />total production in 1955 was 4,039,000 bales from 6 mil- <br />lion acres, an average of 281 pounds per acre and an in- <br />crease of 225 percent in total production over that in <br />1945; about 70 percent of the total was produced in the <br />western part of Texas, The combination of success on <br />irrigated farms and crop failures on farms that de- <br />pended on precipitation produced a marked trend in the <br />agricultural economy from small dryland farms to <br />large irrigated farms. In many instances this has <br />meant a geographic shift, involving abandonment of <br />small farms and development of new acreage where <br />ample water supplies are available for irrigation. One <br /> <br />result of this trend was a reduction from about 330,000 <br />farms and ranches in Texas in 1950 to 290,000 in 1956. <br />The drought encouraged conservation practices such <br />as the use or reuse of water that onCe went to waste, <br />Sewage-treatment plants have converted municipal <br />waste water for use, and the sewage effiuent from San <br />Antonio and Lubbock, for example, is used for irriga- <br />tion, Industrial plants, by recycling cooling water, <br />have been able to operate with less makeup water or to <br />expand operations with no increase in intake, Increas- <br />ing numbers of canals and ditches carrying irrigation <br />water have been lined with concrete or replaced by <br />underground conduits since 1945; this practice is of <br />especial value where the water lost from the canals <br />by seepage could not possibly be recovered frOm ground- <br />water reservoirs. In many areas consumptive waste; of <br />water has been reduced by eradication of such native <br />vegetation as saltcedar' and water hyacinth. Conserva- <br />tion is practiced by some people an the time, but there <br />is more universal attention to it during periods of water <br />deficiency. <br /> <br />NEW MEXICO <br /> <br />The drought of 1942-56 was longer and more severe <br />in New Mexico than in any other State in the Southwest. <br />The entire State has been recognized as a drought- <br />disaster area. In most places even the average precip. <br />itation is insufficient. for cultivation of crops without <br />irrigation, but there is some dry farming, principally of <br />wheat, in the eastern part of the State; as much as 60 <br />percent of these crops fa'iled during the dry year 1956, <br />The range in all parts of New Mexico deteriorated <br />because of deficient precipitation year after year. From <br />1951 to 1956 the number of cattle was reduced each year <br />owing to scarcity of forage. The seriousness of the de- <br />pletion of the range by drought has been pointed up in <br />a report by the Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Ex- <br />periment Station (1956, p, 61) : <br />"Over the 40-year period 1915 to 1954 the average ba- <br />sal density of black grama grass (Bouteloua eriopoda), <br />the most important forage plant on the rang", on quad- <br />rats protected from grazing has varied greatly, Density <br />was reduced to 0,3 percent of the surface area in 1923 <br />as the result of the dry period start.ing in 1916. With <br />the return of rains, density of black grama again in- <br />creased until in 1933 it was 9.5 percent, the maximum <br />for the period of study. As the result of the current <br />drought, black grama has disappeared from the quad- <br />rats. The density each year is correlated with the <br />amount of rainfall received during the preceding 15 <br />months * * *. Such variations in plant cover affect <br />the livestock production. Over the 40-year period, <br />. stocking has been virtually eliminated twice as the re- <br />sult of drought, while in most favorable years stocking <br />