<br />B42
<br />
<br />.. "- ~
<br />
<br />DROUGHT IN THE SOUTHWEST, 1942-56
<br />
<br />also of all those who obtain economic benefit from use
<br />of water,
<br />The belt-tightening operation of reducing the use of
<br />water to the reduced supply is necessary for those who
<br />are largely at the mercy of climatic fluctuations: farm-
<br />ers whose crops, pasture, rangelands, and woodlands
<br />depend upon soil water that is replenished only by pre-
<br />cipitation. Wildlife reacts also to reduce the use of
<br />water because of its dependence upon the raugelands
<br />and woodlands. The "drought-disaster areas" desig-
<br />nated by t.he U.S. Department of Agriculture are pri-
<br />marily t.hose where soil-moisture deficiencies have
<br />caused a subst.antial loss in agricultural income, Be-
<br />cause st.reamflow represents t.he residual or surplus
<br />water from precipitation after evapotranspiration,
<br />water users who depend upon unregulat.ed streamflow
<br />are also at. the mercy of climatic fluctuations, Reduc-
<br />tions in streamflow, and especially periods of no flow,
<br />obviously a.trect fish, run-of-the-river hydroelectric
<br />powerplants, and all those who divert water from an
<br />unregulated stream for any purpose.
<br />Temporary relief can be had by hauling water or
<br />food and feed into areas most severely stricken by
<br />drought and by the migration of wildlife from drought-
<br />stricken areas. Some cities and industries use water of
<br />high cost or inferior quality until sufficient quantit.ies
<br />again become available from the normal sources of sup-
<br />ply. Emergency release of water from some reservoirs
<br />has been necessary for sanitary reasons, when the nat-
<br />ural flow has been iusufficient. for adequat.e dilut.ion of
<br />the pollut.ing wastes consigned to the st.ream. There is
<br />some cost t.o the individuals who benefit. from these
<br />emergency operations, but the money, like the water, is
<br />merely transferred from one area to another. Such op-
<br />erations do not necessarily involve a loss of income re-
<br />gionally, although they change t.he circulation pattern
<br />of money.
<br />The development of a perennial water supply that is
<br />adequate for use during a drought, in addition to reliev-
<br />ing water shortages of the moment, ensures a compa-
<br />rable supply during fut.ure droughts of similar magni-
<br />tude, Such developments are achieved at some cost but
<br />do not represent. an economic loss if a precarious supply
<br />of water is replaced by an adequat.e one; furthermore,
<br />the money paid for the benefit provides income for those
<br />who construct wells and reservoirs and funds for pur-
<br />chase and maintenance of their equipment. Thus
<br />drought may spur development of adequat.e water
<br />supplies,
<br />The met.hods used during the drought to provide an
<br />adequate supply of water are no different from those
<br />required at any other time. The use of water for irri-
<br />gation frees the farmer from dependence on the vagaries
<br />
<br />of precipitation, Irrigation wat.er must be obtained
<br />from some type of reservoir where water accumulat.es
<br />during periods of natural surplus and can be withdrawn
<br />during. periods of drought. Surface reservoirs or
<br />ground-water reservoirs may similarly provide adequate
<br />supplies for cities, industries, and other users, The con-
<br />struction of reservoirs and drilling of wells are thus
<br />indications of efforts to develop an adequate water sup-
<br />ply for the future, There are also several methods of
<br />obtaining greater economic benefit from the water sup-
<br />plies already developed and in use, and t.hese pertain es-
<br />pecially t.o the water used nonconsumptively, They in-
<br />clude treat.ment. and dilution of municipal sewage,
<br />recycling of water used in indust.ry, and increased effi-
<br />ciency in irrigation,
<br />TEXAS
<br />Of the 254 count.ies in Texas, 245 were in the drought
<br />disast.er area as of January 1, 1957, and had received
<br />Federal aid t.otaling $223 million, These counties have
<br />a rural population of more than 1 million who live on
<br />about. 282,000 farms and ranches, One of the counties
<br />most severaly affected by drought. was Karnes, in sout.h
<br />Texas, where the population was reduced 10 percent.
<br />during. the drought years, and 60 percent of those re-
<br />maining were on the county's free-food program during
<br />1956, The State's annual production of wheat provides
<br />an indication of the effect of drought upon crops which
<br />depend directly upon precipit.at.ion, because wheat is
<br />rarely irrigated: in wet 1946, 6,835,000 acres was
<br />planted in wheat, of which 5,992,000 was harvested; in
<br />dry 1955, 4,308,000 acres was planted and only 1,508,000
<br />acres was harvested,
<br />Almost two-thirds of Texas is rangeland-including
<br />pasture, woodland pasture, and forest.--where grasses
<br />are the dominant vegetation of economic value, These
<br />grasses were severely reduced during the drought years
<br />1951-56, with a consequent reduction in wildlife popu-
<br />lation; according to the Texas Fish and Game Commis-
<br />sion, turkeys and quail were fewer than ever before and
<br />the deer population was reduced by malnutrition, par-
<br />ticularly in 1954, There was also a reduction in domes-
<br />t.ic liveStock population because of the diminished feed
<br />and forage, From 1945 to 1955 the population of sheep
<br />decreased 46 percent and of hogs 52 percent; the num-
<br />ber of cattle. in the western two-thirds of Texas was re-
<br />duced 17 percent during the decade, partly by shifting
<br />herds to the more humid eastern third of the State.
<br />Diminution of streamflow during drought resulted in
<br />reduction of hydroelectric-power generation, At the
<br />Devils River powerplants near Del Rio, operated by the
<br />Cent.ral Power and Light Co, of Corpus Christi, the
<br />average production in the 5 years 1951-55 was only
<br />about half the average for the 17 years prior to the
<br />
|