Laserfiche WebLink
<br />B42 <br /> <br />.. "- ~ <br /> <br />DROUGHT IN THE SOUTHWEST, 1942-56 <br /> <br />also of all those who obtain economic benefit from use <br />of water, <br />The belt-tightening operation of reducing the use of <br />water to the reduced supply is necessary for those who <br />are largely at the mercy of climatic fluctuations: farm- <br />ers whose crops, pasture, rangelands, and woodlands <br />depend upon soil water that is replenished only by pre- <br />cipitation. Wildlife reacts also to reduce the use of <br />water because of its dependence upon the raugelands <br />and woodlands. The "drought-disaster areas" desig- <br />nated by t.he U.S. Department of Agriculture are pri- <br />marily t.hose where soil-moisture deficiencies have <br />caused a subst.antial loss in agricultural income, Be- <br />cause st.reamflow represents t.he residual or surplus <br />water from precipitation after evapotranspiration, <br />water users who depend upon unregulat.ed streamflow <br />are also at. the mercy of climatic fluctuations, Reduc- <br />tions in streamflow, and especially periods of no flow, <br />obviously a.trect fish, run-of-the-river hydroelectric <br />powerplants, and all those who divert water from an <br />unregulated stream for any purpose. <br />Temporary relief can be had by hauling water or <br />food and feed into areas most severely stricken by <br />drought and by the migration of wildlife from drought- <br />stricken areas. Some cities and industries use water of <br />high cost or inferior quality until sufficient quantit.ies <br />again become available from the normal sources of sup- <br />ply. Emergency release of water from some reservoirs <br />has been necessary for sanitary reasons, when the nat- <br />ural flow has been iusufficient. for adequat.e dilut.ion of <br />the pollut.ing wastes consigned to the st.ream. There is <br />some cost t.o the individuals who benefit. from these <br />emergency operations, but the money, like the water, is <br />merely transferred from one area to another. Such op- <br />erations do not necessarily involve a loss of income re- <br />gionally, although they change t.he circulation pattern <br />of money. <br />The development of a perennial water supply that is <br />adequate for use during a drought, in addition to reliev- <br />ing water shortages of the moment, ensures a compa- <br />rable supply during fut.ure droughts of similar magni- <br />tude, Such developments are achieved at some cost but <br />do not represent. an economic loss if a precarious supply <br />of water is replaced by an adequat.e one; furthermore, <br />the money paid for the benefit provides income for those <br />who construct wells and reservoirs and funds for pur- <br />chase and maintenance of their equipment. Thus <br />drought may spur development of adequat.e water <br />supplies, <br />The met.hods used during the drought to provide an <br />adequate supply of water are no different from those <br />required at any other time. The use of water for irri- <br />gation frees the farmer from dependence on the vagaries <br /> <br />of precipitation, Irrigation wat.er must be obtained <br />from some type of reservoir where water accumulat.es <br />during periods of natural surplus and can be withdrawn <br />during. periods of drought. Surface reservoirs or <br />ground-water reservoirs may similarly provide adequate <br />supplies for cities, industries, and other users, The con- <br />struction of reservoirs and drilling of wells are thus <br />indications of efforts to develop an adequate water sup- <br />ply for the future, There are also several methods of <br />obtaining greater economic benefit from the water sup- <br />plies already developed and in use, and t.hese pertain es- <br />pecially t.o the water used nonconsumptively, They in- <br />clude treat.ment. and dilution of municipal sewage, <br />recycling of water used in indust.ry, and increased effi- <br />ciency in irrigation, <br />TEXAS <br />Of the 254 count.ies in Texas, 245 were in the drought <br />disast.er area as of January 1, 1957, and had received <br />Federal aid t.otaling $223 million, These counties have <br />a rural population of more than 1 million who live on <br />about. 282,000 farms and ranches, One of the counties <br />most severaly affected by drought. was Karnes, in sout.h <br />Texas, where the population was reduced 10 percent. <br />during. the drought years, and 60 percent of those re- <br />maining were on the county's free-food program during <br />1956, The State's annual production of wheat provides <br />an indication of the effect of drought upon crops which <br />depend directly upon precipit.at.ion, because wheat is <br />rarely irrigated: in wet 1946, 6,835,000 acres was <br />planted in wheat, of which 5,992,000 was harvested; in <br />dry 1955, 4,308,000 acres was planted and only 1,508,000 <br />acres was harvested, <br />Almost two-thirds of Texas is rangeland-including <br />pasture, woodland pasture, and forest.--where grasses <br />are the dominant vegetation of economic value, These <br />grasses were severely reduced during the drought years <br />1951-56, with a consequent reduction in wildlife popu- <br />lation; according to the Texas Fish and Game Commis- <br />sion, turkeys and quail were fewer than ever before and <br />the deer population was reduced by malnutrition, par- <br />ticularly in 1954, There was also a reduction in domes- <br />t.ic liveStock population because of the diminished feed <br />and forage, From 1945 to 1955 the population of sheep <br />decreased 46 percent and of hogs 52 percent; the num- <br />ber of cattle. in the western two-thirds of Texas was re- <br />duced 17 percent during the decade, partly by shifting <br />herds to the more humid eastern third of the State. <br />Diminution of streamflow during drought resulted in <br />reduction of hydroelectric-power generation, At the <br />Devils River powerplants near Del Rio, operated by the <br />Cent.ral Power and Light Co, of Corpus Christi, the <br />average production in the 5 years 1951-55 was only <br />about half the average for the 17 years prior to the <br />