My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10371
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10371
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:58:36 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:17:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8111.805
Description
Arkansas River Compact Administration - Keesee Ditch
Basin
Arkansas
Date
1/1/1986
Author
HRS Engineering
Title
Keesee Ditch Change of Water Rights Vol 1 - Historical Operation of Kessee Ditch
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />In stream depletion analysis, the length of delay for recharge to reach the <br />stream is' described by the "Stream Depletion Factor" (SDF) for a particular <br />location or distance from the stream. The SDF method was developed by the <br />U.S. Geological Survey for the purpose of determining the effect on a surface <br />stream res)Jlting from pumping of water from an alluvial aquifer. The SDF value <br />for a location in the alluvial aquifer is the number of days for a certain percentage <br />of the pumping impact on the river to occur. Essentially, locations close to the <br />river have a lower SDF value than locations farther away, meaning that the river <br />is impacted more quickly by nearstream operations than by more distant <br />operations. <br /> <br />To analyze stream accretions or return flows for the Keesee Ditch, the <br />SDF methoQ was used to model the effects of recharge instead of pumping. Plate <br />3 includes a series of SDF value contours for the reach of the Arkansas River <br />in the vicinity of the Keesee Ditch. It was derived from ,a series of maps of <br />the Arkansas River Valley published by the U.S. Geological Survey (Jenkins and <br />Taylor, 1972). The proportional areas of the Keesee Ditch irrigation system <br />which occured between these contours were measured and an average SDF value <br />assigned to each area. The amounts of monthly irrigation recharge, as determined <br />from the water budget analysis, were then proportioned in a similar manner to <br />simulate the distribution of recharge for the irrigation operations. The amount <br />and timing of river accretions were then calculated based on the assigned SDF <br />values. <br /> <br />Table VII includes the monthly irrigation returns to the Arkansas River as <br />calculated ,using the SDF methodology. The calculated average annual return <br />flow to the river was 2,020 acre-feet per year. <br /> <br />The net depletions to the river resulting from the Keesee Ditch operation <br />are the result of both diversions and return flows. Since the depletion effect <br />of diversiohs is essentially instantaneous, the net river depletions may be <br />calculated as simply diversions, as represented by Table V, minus returns as <br />represented by Table VII. Table VIII includes the calculated net depletions to <br />the Arkans!1.s River resulting from Keesee Ditch irrigation of the decreed 1400 <br />acres. Positive numbers in the table are net river depletions while negative <br />numbers indicate months when return flows exceeded depletions. Averaged over <br /> <br />-17- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.