My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10371
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10371
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:58:36 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:17:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8111.805
Description
Arkansas River Compact Administration - Keesee Ditch
Basin
Arkansas
Date
1/1/1986
Author
HRS Engineering
Title
Keesee Ditch Change of Water Rights Vol 1 - Historical Operation of Kessee Ditch
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Return Flow Analysis <br /> <br />A simple estimate of the net impact to the Arkansas River resulting from <br />the historical operation of the Keesee Ditch would be the average annual <br />consumptive use for the study period. This volume estimate, however, does not <br />account for the timing differences between river depletions or diversions, which <br />have an immediate effect on the river, and river accretions or return flows, <br />which are delayed. On a monthly basis, the net depletion or reduction in flow <br />of the Arkansas River, is the sum of the monthly diversions minus the monthly <br />return flows. Since the timing effects of diversions can easily be represented <br />by the Keesee Ditch diversion records, the major components in the analysis <br />of net stream effects involves the determination of the timing of return flows. <br /> <br />Irrigation return flows are the result of seepage losses from the irrigation <br />delivery system and excess irrigation water. Most of this water percolates <br />downward throught the soil and recharges the alluvial aquifer, while only a small <br />percentage. enters the stream directly as surface runoff. For this analysis, it <br />was assumed that all irrigation return flows recharged the alluvial aquifer <br />underlying the irrigated area. '5 ' <br /> <br />The alluvial aquifer underlying the land irrigated by the Keesee Ditch consists <br />of deposits of sand, gravel, and clay laid down by the Arkansas River. Ground <br />water in this alluvium is part of the same hydrologic system as the river, although <br />movement of water through these materials is much slower than flow in the <br />river. Because of this, irrigation returns which recharge the alluvial aquifer <br />do not affect the surface stream to any significant extent for some time after <br />the recharge occurs. The timing of this effect is a function of the distance from <br />the stream at which recharge occurs and the hydrologic characteristics of the <br />aquifer. Not only are these effects delayed, but they are also "stretched out" <br />so that the effect on the surface stream occurs over a longer period of time <br />and with less intensity than the recharge. Consequently, the effects on the surface <br />stream continue to occur for some period after recharge has ceased. The <br />determination of the amounts and timing of these effects is made using a method <br />called stream depletion analysis. <br /> <br />-16- <br /> <br />),,\-'~ <br /> <br />\. \,~ <br />" <br />re~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.