My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP10311
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
10001-10999
>
WSP10311
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:58:15 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 4:15:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.765
Description
White River General
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
11/1/1980
Author
Utah Div of Water Re
Title
White River Dam Project - Proposed Action Plan
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />F.]11'?1.." <br />Mr. Paul Pi!~!f"i-l;~ 't <br />Page 3 <br />June 6, 1979 <br /> <br />Hydro-electric potential of the dam: A run-of-river hydro-power <br />installation rated at 8.0 megawatts at the proposed Hhite River dam site. <br />could produce approximately 25,000,000 kilowatt-hours of electricity. A <br />peaking power installation rated at 15 megawatts could produce approximately <br />30,000,000 kilowatt-hours of electricity at the proposed site. <br /> <br />Hhite River Shale Project: The "Detailed Development Plan .- Federal <br />Lease Tracts Ua and Ub", Vol. 2 page 7.14-10 prepared by WRSP indicates <br />in a discussion on selection rationale that White River Dam and Reservoir <br />is 'the preferred plan for developing a water supply for the project. The <br />reasons for the selection are: <br /> <br />1. Its close proximity to the leases. <br /> <br />2. The multiple benefits served by the dam (recreation, hydro- <br />electric generation, Indian irrigation, reservoir and stream <br />fishery habitat improvement). <br /> <br />3. . The competence of the dam site. <br /> <br />4. The efficiency of the reservoir. <br /> <br />5. Its lower cost. <br /> <br />Other alternative sources of water considered were a) Flaming Gorge <br />Reservoir, b) Starvation Reservoir, c) Red Fleet Reservoir, d) Hatson <br />Reservoir, and e) Hells Hole Canyon Reservoir. <br /> <br />Water Supply: The historical record of annual discharges of the <br />White River near Watson (USGS stream gage located about seven (7) miles <br />upstream of the dam site) averages 508,000 acre-feet for the 1924 to <br />1973 period. (See figure 2). Some 42% of the annual runoff usually <br />occurs during the months of f1ay and June each year as shown by figure 3. <br /> <br />Environmental Impact Statement: Prior to construction of the dam <br />and reservoir and the granting of a Special Use Permit by the Bureau of <br />Land Management (BLM) to construct the reservoir on federal lands~ an <br />Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared. The state officially <br />requested the Bureau of Land Management to initiate an environmental impact <br />statement on August 4, 1975. To date the BLM has refused to initiate the <br />statement process. <br /> <br />In the state's most recent correspondence from the BLM (February 7, <br />1979) the National Director of BLM sent the State Director of BLM a memo <br />outlining the following items that must be answered before the BLM can <br />start on the Environmental Statement. <br /> <br />a. How do the Indians intend to use water allocated to them from <br />the project? <br />b. What will the downstream flow below the Indian's diversion be? <br />c. Does Moon Lake Electric (Deseret) plan to use White River <br />Dam water or another source? <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.