Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />E. Allocation of Storage <br /> <br />The total storage capacity of the reservoir is 105,000 acre-feet; of this <br /> <br /> <br />amount approximately 7,000 acre-feet will be dead (below the water level intake of <br /> <br /> <br />the outlet works) an additional 31,000 acre-feet making a total of 38,000 acre-feet <br /> <br /> <br />will be inactive, reserved for sediment storage and fish conservation or both. <br /> <br /> <br />Contemplated uses of the active storage of 67,000 acre-feet will not encroach on <br /> <br /> <br />the inactive storage level as shown in the Simulation Study. <br /> <br />The active storage capacity of the 'reservoir has not been allocated to <br /> <br /> <br />specific uses such as oil shale, ,steam power plant, or irrigation. The computer <br /> <br /> <br />reservoir operation study generated monthly flows in acre-feet below White River <br /> <br />reservoir for power production, Ute Indian irrigation and Tosco energy use for the <br /> <br />1931 to 1978 period as follows: <br /> <br />Month <br /> <br />Average Flows <br />Below the Res. <br /> <br />Ute Indian <br />Irrigation Supply <br /> <br />Tosco <br />Supply <br /> <br />Oct. <br />Nov. <br />Dec. <br />Jan. <br />Feb. <br />Mar. <br />Apr. <br />May <br />June <br />July <br />Aug. <br />Sept. <br /> <br />Total <br /> <br />18,789 <br />17,885 <br />16,667 <br />16,440 <br />18,998 <br />30,358 <br />32,848 <br />68,991 <br />94,391 <br />31,395 <br />19,579 <br />17,145 <br /> <br />383,487 <br /> <br />1,352 <br /> <br />1,500 <br />1,500 <br />1,500 <br />1,500 <br />1,500 <br />1,500 <br />1,500 <br />1,500 <br />1,500 <br />1,500 <br />1,500 <br />1,500 <br /> <br />18,000 <br /> <br />1,802 <br />6,986 <br />10,366 <br />13,296 <br />11,268 <br />6,310 <br /> <br />51,380 <br /> <br />This tabulation serves to indicate that ample water will be released from <br /> <br /> <br />the reservoir in anyone month of the year to meet downstream demands. The <br /> <br /> <br />simulation study did not differentiate by direct flows and storage releases <br /> <br /> <br />the supply to irrigation and energy uses. The simulation study is available <br /> <br /> <br />for inspection at the Division of Water Resources office, 231 East 400 South, <br /> <br /> <br />Salt Lake City, Utah. <br /> <br />F. Maximum Reservoir Drawdown <br /> <br />The reservoir could be drawn down 46 feet before reaching the inactive <br /> <br /> <br />storage level. However, generally it is not anticipated that the reservoir water <br /> <br /> <br />level will fluctuate more than about 35 feet under any foreseeable future water <br /> <br />- 40 - <br />